ArticleScientific reports2025
The complete chloroplast genomes of four Aspidopterys species and a comparison with other Malpighiaceae species.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The Complete Chloroplast Genome ofGenes · 2025Article
- The complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The genus Aspidopterys has multiple functions in medicine, food and ecological restoration. Due to the similar morphological characteristics of some species and the limited genomic information hinder the studies on germplasm identification and molecular phylogeny analysis. In this study, we compared and explored the six complete chloroplast (cp) genomes including four Aspidopterys species (A. glabriuscula, A. concava, A. cavaleriei, A. obcordata), Banisteriopsis caapi and Bunchosia argentea. Their cp genomes in length were 158,473 to 161,091 bp, displaying the high conserved degree in the structure, gene arrangement and GC content. Moreover, 57-80 long repeats and 61-92 SSRs were identified, most of which were forward or palindromic repeats and mononucleotides, respectively. Eleven non-coding regions and 12 coding regions, especially ndhH_ndhA, rpl32_ndhF and ycf1, had the higher nucleotide diversity values that could can be regarded as DNA barcodes of Malpighiaceae species. In addition, the 9 genes (like accD, atpE, atpF, clpP) were conducted positive selection (Ka/Ks > 1). As indicated by phylogenetic analysis, those four Aspidopterys were clustered into single clade with other Malpighiaceae species and were closely related to B. caapi and B. argentea. This study sheds more lights on further phylogenetic, evolutionary and genetic diversity studies on the genus Aspidopterys and even the Malpighiaceae species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.