Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40410277›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A robust and statistical analyzed predictive model for drug toxicity using machine learning.

Deepak Rawat, Rohit Bajaj, Rachit Manchanda, Ankush Mehta, Prabhu Paramasivam, Suraj Kumar Bhagat, Abinet Gosaye Ayanie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Deepak RawatDepartment of Mathematics, Chandigarh University, Mohali, Punjab, 140413, India.
Rohit BajajDepartment of Computer Sciences, Chandigarh University, Mohali, Punjab, 140413, India.
Rachit ManchandaDepartment of Computer Sciences, Chandigarh University, Mohali, Punjab, 140413, India.
Ankush MehtaMarwadi University Research Center, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering & Technology, Marwadi University, Rajkot, 360003, Gujarat, India.
Prabhu ParamasivamDepartment of Research and Innovation, Saveetha School of Engineering, SIMATS, Chennai, 602105, Tamil Nadu, India. lptprabhu@gmail.com.
Suraj Kumar BhagatMarwadi University Research Center, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering & Technology, Marwadi University, Rajkot, 360003, Gujrat, India.
Abinet Gosaye AyanieDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Adama Science and Technology University, Adama, 2552, Ethiopia. abinet.gosaye@astu.edu.et.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the years, toxicity prediction has been a challenging task. Artificial intelligence and machine learning provide a platform to study toxicity prediction more accurately with a reduced time span. An optimized ensembled model is used to contrast the results of seven machine learning algorithms and three deep learning models with regard to state-of-the-art parameters. In the paper, optimized model is developed that combined eager random forest and sluggish k star techniques. State-of-the-art parameters have been evaluated and compared for three scenarios. In first scenario with original features, in the second scenario using feature selection and resampling technique with the percentage split method, and in the third scenario using feature selection and resampling technique with 10-fold cross-validation. The principal component analysis is performed for feature selection. An optimized ensembled model performs well in comparison to other models in all three scenarios. It achieved an accuracy of 77% in the first scenario, 89% in the second scenario, and 93% in the third scenario. The proposed model shows the performance increase in accuracy by 8% as compared to the top performer Kstar machine learning model and 21% as compared to deep learning model AIPs-DeepEnC-GA which is remarkable. Also there is significant improvement in other important evaluation parameters in comparison to top performing models. Further concept of W-saw score and L-saw is presented for all the scenarios. An optimized ensembled model using feature selection and resampling technique with tenfold cross-validation performs best among all machine learning models in all the scenarios.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsMachine LearningModels, StatisticalAlgorithmsDeep LearningHumansPrincipal Component Analysis10-Fold cross validationEnsemblingFeature selectionPercentage splitResamplingSaw score

Identifiers

PMID40410277
PMCPMC12102208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.