ArticleScientific reports2025
Prediction and optimization of hardness in AlSi10Mg alloy produced by laser powder bed fusion using statistical and machine learning approaches.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the influence of critical process parameters on the hardness of AlSi10Mg alloy fabricated via the Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) technique. To optimize these parameters, a Taguchi-based signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio analysis was employed. Furthermore, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was conducted to quantify the statistical significance and contribution ratio of each parameter to the observed variation in hardness. In addition, Machine Learning algorithms were applied to predict hardness values. A multidisciplinary approach was adopted to optimize production processes, reduce manufacturing costs, and shorten processing times. Taguchi and ANOVA analyses were performed using Minitab 21, while Machine Learning implementations were carried out in R statistical software. The applied Machine Learning techniques include Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Multiple Linear Regression (MLR). The results indicate that scan speed exerts the most significant influence on hardness, followed by laser power. Notably, the highest hardness was achieved using a laser power of 200 W, a hatch distance of 0.20 mm, and a scan speed of 2000 mm/s. Among the models, SVM achieved the highest coefficient of determination (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.