Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40410276›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Prediction and optimization of hardness in AlSi10Mg alloy produced by laser powder bed fusion using statistical and machine learning approaches.

İnayet Burcu Toprak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

İnayet Burcu ToprakVocational School of Technical Sciences, Akdeniz University, Antalya, Turkey. ibmutlu@akdeniz.edu.tr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0894-5573

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the influence of critical process parameters on the hardness of AlSi10Mg alloy fabricated via the Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) technique. To optimize these parameters, a Taguchi-based signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio analysis was employed. Furthermore, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was conducted to quantify the statistical significance and contribution ratio of each parameter to the observed variation in hardness. In addition, Machine Learning algorithms were applied to predict hardness values. A multidisciplinary approach was adopted to optimize production processes, reduce manufacturing costs, and shorten processing times. Taguchi and ANOVA analyses were performed using Minitab 21, while Machine Learning implementations were carried out in R statistical software. The applied Machine Learning techniques include Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Multiple Linear Regression (MLR). The results indicate that scan speed exerts the most significant influence on hardness, followed by laser power. Notably, the highest hardness was achieved using a laser power of 200 W, a hatch distance of 0.20 mm, and a scan speed of 2000 mm/s. Among the models, SVM achieved the highest coefficient of determination (R

Indexed as

Hardness optimizationLaser powder bed fusionMachine learning in additive manufacturingProcess parameter optimizationTaguchi method

Identifiers

PMID40410276
PMCPMC12102142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.