Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40410265›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Machine learning analysis of factors contributing to hypotension after lumbosacral epidural anaesthesia in dogs undergoing abdominal surgery.

Carlos Millán Parreño, Dominic Giles, Federico Corletto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carlos Millán ParreñoDick White Referrals, part of Linnaeus Veterinary Limited, Cambridgeshire, UK. carlos.millan@ndsr.co.uk.
Dominic GilesUCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Federico CorlettoDick White Referrals, part of Linnaeus Veterinary Limited, Cambridgeshire, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of hypotension after a lumbosacral epidural in dogs depends on the volume of local anaesthetic administered. So far, there are no reports comparing both methods used to calculate this volume-body weight (BW) and occipito-coccygeal length (OCL)-in veterinary medicine. In this study, we evaluated the effect of these two common dosing strategies on risk of intraoperative hypotension in dogs undergoing abdominal surgery. Data were collected retrospectively from 210 dogs in a veterinary specialist hospital, with 110 receiving OCL-based dosing and 100 receiving BW-based dosing. Comparing logistic regression and ExtraTrees machine learning models (both demonstrating strong predictive performance, with AUROC 0.78 and 0.79, respectively, and supported by external validation on an independent dataset), we identified additional factors associated with post-epidural hypotension, including body temperature, minimum alveolar concentration, sex, and premedication. Our findings revealed that post-epidural hypotension occurred more frequently in the OCL group compared to the BW group (49.1% vs. 33%, respectively, p = 0.025). Despite both dosing strategies being considered effective, the OCL method resulted in a greater incidence of post-epidural hypotension. Our findings highlight the importance of careful individualized risk-benefit analyses for epidural dosing strategy.

Indexed as

AbdomenAnesthesia, EpiduralHypotensionMachine LearningAnimalsDogsFemaleLumbosacral RegionMaleRetrospective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID40410265
PMCPMC12102333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.