ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning analysis of factors contributing to hypotension after lumbosacral epidural anaesthesia in dogs undergoing abdominal surgery.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Interpreting cranial abdominal coverage after caudal epidural local anesthetic administration in dogs and cats.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incidence of hypotension after a lumbosacral epidural in dogs depends on the volume of local anaesthetic administered. So far, there are no reports comparing both methods used to calculate this volume-body weight (BW) and occipito-coccygeal length (OCL)-in veterinary medicine. In this study, we evaluated the effect of these two common dosing strategies on risk of intraoperative hypotension in dogs undergoing abdominal surgery. Data were collected retrospectively from 210 dogs in a veterinary specialist hospital, with 110 receiving OCL-based dosing and 100 receiving BW-based dosing. Comparing logistic regression and ExtraTrees machine learning models (both demonstrating strong predictive performance, with AUROC 0.78 and 0.79, respectively, and supported by external validation on an independent dataset), we identified additional factors associated with post-epidural hypotension, including body temperature, minimum alveolar concentration, sex, and premedication. Our findings revealed that post-epidural hypotension occurred more frequently in the OCL group compared to the BW group (49.1% vs. 33%, respectively, p = 0.025). Despite both dosing strategies being considered effective, the OCL method resulted in a greater incidence of post-epidural hypotension. Our findings highlight the importance of careful individualized risk-benefit analyses for epidural dosing strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.