ArticleScientific reports2025
In-store food promotions increase sales as well as household food waste.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Behavioral Interventions for Consumer Food Waste Reduction: A Multi-Level Governance Perspective.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Food waste is a serious problem affecting both global food security and climate change. Using a large-scale field experiment with data from 43,246 perishable vegetable purchases from eight supermarkets, we show that in-store offers lead to over-purchasing of food items and result in an increase in household food waste. Shoppers exposed to multi-unit offers (e.g., "2 for $5" or two-for-one pricing) purchase greater food quantities compared to those exposed to a single-unit discounts (e.g., "$2.50, regular price $2.89" or "50% off"). A follow-up survey shows that these additional items are subsequently less likely to be consumed, leading to an increase in household food waste. A complementary online survey provides further support for these results. Importantly, as a part of the field experiment, we test two strategies that can address in-store over-purchasing. Taken together, the current findings provide important insights into factors that increase over-purchasing and household food waste, as well as strategies that can help overcome them. We thus demonstrate how retailers can negatively, but also positively, impact important societal and environmental causes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.