Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40410223›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Investigating the causal role of motor brain areas in rhythm reproduction: a transcranial direct current stimulation study.

Marina Emerick, Joshua D Hoddinott, Jessica A Grahn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marina EmerickCentre for Brain and Mind, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada. mdeoliv4@uwo.ca.
Joshua D HoddinottCentre for Brain and Mind, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Jessica A GrahnCentre for Brain and Mind, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

NSERC Canada Graduate Scholarship CGSD-2024-589704NSERC Discovery Grant RGPIN-2016-05834NSERC Steacie Fellowship 566202-2021-SMFSU
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans have an intrinsic tendency to move to the beat in music, yet the neural mechanisms behind the music-movement connection remain poorly understood. Most studies to date have been correlational. In this study, we used transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to explore the causal role of four brain regions commonly involved in movement timing and beat perception: the supplementary motor area (SMA), the left and right premotor cortices (PMC), and the right cerebellum. Participants received anodal, cathodal, or sham stimulation in one of the four regions on three separate days while reproducing strong-beat, weak-beat, and non-beat rhythms via finger tapping. Because the SMA is thought to play a central role in beat perception, while the premotor cortex and cerebellum are involved in general timing processes, we predicted that SMA stimulation would influence the reproduction of beat-based rhythms, while premotor and cerebellar stimulation would affect the reproduction of non-beat rhythms. As expected, reproduction accuracy depended on beat strength; strong-beat rhythms were more accurately reproduced than weak and non-beat rhythms. Unexpectedly, tDCS had no effect on reproduction accuracy in any brain region. Thus, we found no evidence that modulating brain excitability in SMA, PMC, or cerebellum altered the accuracy of rhythm reproduction.

Indexed as

CerebellumMotor CortexTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAdultEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansMaleMusicYoung AdultBeat perceptionCerebellumMusic cognitionPremotor cortexSupplementary motor areaTranscranial direct current stimulation

Identifiers

PMID40410223
PMCPMC12102183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.