ArticleScientific reports2025
Investigating the causal role of motor brain areas in rhythm reproduction: a transcranial direct current stimulation study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Humans have an intrinsic tendency to move to the beat in music, yet the neural mechanisms behind the music-movement connection remain poorly understood. Most studies to date have been correlational. In this study, we used transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to explore the causal role of four brain regions commonly involved in movement timing and beat perception: the supplementary motor area (SMA), the left and right premotor cortices (PMC), and the right cerebellum. Participants received anodal, cathodal, or sham stimulation in one of the four regions on three separate days while reproducing strong-beat, weak-beat, and non-beat rhythms via finger tapping. Because the SMA is thought to play a central role in beat perception, while the premotor cortex and cerebellum are involved in general timing processes, we predicted that SMA stimulation would influence the reproduction of beat-based rhythms, while premotor and cerebellar stimulation would affect the reproduction of non-beat rhythms. As expected, reproduction accuracy depended on beat strength; strong-beat rhythms were more accurately reproduced than weak and non-beat rhythms. Unexpectedly, tDCS had no effect on reproduction accuracy in any brain region. Thus, we found no evidence that modulating brain excitability in SMA, PMC, or cerebellum altered the accuracy of rhythm reproduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.