ArticleScientific data2025
A large-scale MEG and EEG dataset for object recognition in naturalistic scenes.
Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A large-scale fMRI dataset for vision-language semantic association.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neuroimaging with large-scale naturalistic stimuli is increasingly employed to elucidate neural mechanisms of object recognition in natural scenes. However, most existing large-scale neuroimaging datasets with naturalistic stimuli primarily rely on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), which provides high spatial resolution but is limited in capturing the temporal dynamics. To address this limitation, we extended our Natural Object Dataset-fMRI (NOD-fMRI) by collecting both magnetoencephalography (MEG) and electroencephalography (EEG) data from the same participants while viewing the same naturalistic stimuli. As a result, NOD contains fMRI, MEG, and EEG responses to 57,000 naturalistic images from 30 participants. This enables the examination of brain activity elicited by naturalistic stimuli with both high spatial resolution (via fMRI) and high temporal resolution (via MEG and EEG). Furthermore, the multimodal nature of NOD allows researchers to combine datasets from different modalities to achieve a more comprehensive view of object processing. We believe that the NOD dataset will serve as a valuable resource for advancing our understanding of the cognitive and neural mechanisms underlying object recognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.