ArticleSpinal cord series and cases2025
Charcot spinal arthropathy: a case series.
Article in Spinal cord series and cases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designA retrospective case series analysing six cases of Charcot spinal arthropathy.
objectivesTo evaluate the etiology, clinical manifestations (e.g., pain, trunk instability, autonomic dysreflexia, spasticity), latency period before symptom onset, affected spinal regions, and treatment strategies for Charcot spinal arthropathy.
settingNational Spinal Injury Centre, United Kingdom.
methodsData were collected and analysed from six patients diagnosed with Charcot spinal arthropathy. Variables examined included the etiology, clinical presentations, spinal regions affected, latency period, and outcomes of treatment approaches. Both conservative management and surgical intervention strategies were evaluated.
resultsPatients exhibited common clinical manifestations such as pain, loss of trunk control, autonomic dysreflexia, and spasticity, with varying latency periods before symptom onset. The thoracic spine was the most frequently affected region. Conservative management successfully stabilized symptoms in most cases, while surgical intervention was necessary in instances of severe trunk instability, refractory pain, or deformity impacting mobility.
conclusionConservative management should be the initial treatment approach for Charcot spinal arthropathy. Surgical intervention is reserved for cases with significant clinical progression, such as unresolved pain, mobility restrictions due to trunk deformity, or urgent complications arising from spinal pathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.