Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40409956›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Barriers and facilitators to implementing reusable personal protective equipment in hospitals, and their impacts on environment, care safety, costs, and supply chain resilience: a scoping review protocol.

Nathalie Clavel, François M Castonguay, Claudie Laprise, Stephan Williams, Isabelle Ethier, Marie-Claude Bernier, Christine Beauharnais

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nathalie ClavelÉcole de santé publique, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada nathalie.clavel@umontreal.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0438-6655
François M CastonguayUniversity of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Claudie LapriseÉcole de santé publique, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Stephan WilliamsUniversité de Montréal Faculté de Médecine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Isabelle EthierUniversité de Montréal Faculté de Médecine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Marie-Claude BernierCentre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Christine BeauharnaisÉcole de santé publique, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionClimate degradation poses a significant global health challenge, with healthcare systems paradoxically contributing to this issue while adhering to the principle of 'do no harm'. Notably, the healthcare sector accounts for a considerable share of greenhouse gas emissions in many industrialised countries, primarily due to the supply chain, including pharmaceuticals, disposable medical devices and personal protective equipment (PPE). The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated this issue, with millions of tons of CO METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This protocol is based on York's five-stage framework outlined by Arksey and O'Malley. We will map evidence on the environmental and economic impacts of reusable versus disposable PPE, and the associated infection risks. Using an adapted Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, our scoping review will identify enablers and barriers to implementation across different clinical settings. The methodology will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Review guidelines and will include a comprehensive search of peer-reviewed articles in five databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science and Global Health) and grey literature. Databases will be searched from inception to December 2024. Two reviewers will independently evaluate the eligibility of all identified titles and abstracts for inclusion in the full-text review, as well as for data extraction. Descriptive data will provide insights into the enablers and facilitators of reusable PPE adoption and implementation, along with its impacts on patient and staff safety, costs, the environment and supply chain resilience to disruptions will be reported. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: We expect the results to both identify research gaps and generate novel ideas for future studies on transitioning to reusable PPE in healthcare settings. This review will offer healthcare decision-makers valuable insights into the factors influencing the shift from disposable to reusable PPE and its associated impacts. By refining PPE management strategies, the findings will enable managers to clearly understand the challenges and anticipated outcomes, thereby guiding effective decision-making and facilitating a smooth transition that minimises operational disruptions while upholding patient and staff safety. Ethics approval was not required for this review. The findings will be shared through conferences on healthcare management and sustainability, and submitted to peer-reviewed journals in healthcare management and implementation science. TRIAL REGISTRATION DETAILS: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/DESVU.

Indexed as

COVID-19Equipment ReuseHospitalsPersonal Protective EquipmentHumansPatient SafetySARS-CoV-2Scoping Reviews as TopicHealth Care CostsInfection controlOrganisation of health servicesSafety

Identifiers

PMID40409956
PMCPMC12104935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.