Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40409763›Full record

ReviewBMJ global health2025

Making health insurance responsive to citizens: learning from six low-income and middle-income countries.

Anas Ismail, Inke Mathauer, Patricia Akweongo, Mery Concepcion Bolivar Vargas, Sapna Desai, Dinna Prapto Raharja, Modupe Adeoti Ogundimu, Stela Stojisavljevic, Manuela De Allegri, Zubin Cyrus Shroff

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anas IsmailAlliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Inke MathauerHealth Financing and Economics, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland mathaueri@who.int.
Patricia AkweongoSchool of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Mery Concepcion Bolivar VargasFaculty of Economic and Administrative Sciences, Universidad de Bogotá Jorge Tadeo Lozano, Bogota, Colombia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6628-5032
Sapna DesaiPopulation Council Institute, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Dinna Prapto RaharjaInternational Relations, Synergy Policies, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6028-563X
Modupe Adeoti OgundimuNational Health Insurance Authority, Abuja, Nigeria.
Stela StojisavljevicDepartment of Social Medicine, Public Health Institue of the Republic of Srpska, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Manuela De Allegri *Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8677-1337
Zubin Cyrus Shroff *Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0582-8582

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany low-income and middle-income countries have introduced public health insurance systems, whereby, thanks to government subsidies, selected groups are entitled to receive insurance coverage even if not paying direct contributions into the system. These efforts towards achieving universal health coverage were often undermined by difficulties in enrolment and registration, barriers to health service utilisation or complicated rules around service packages. Governmental and non-governmental accountability initiatives have been established to overcome these barriers in order to make health insurance programmes responsive and to empower citizens. This paper examines evidence and synthesizes lessons from 20 accountability initiatives in six selected countries to understand how these achieved (or not) these goals.

methodsWe systematically analysed six final reports and five published papers which were part of a multicountry research programme from 2019 to end of 2022 studying accountability initiatives. Between June 2023 and September 2024, we systematically extracted data and synthesised findings from the reports and papers based on a conceptual framework, adapted from a framework developed by Molyneux, which had been adopted by the country teams to guide their studies. We coded the extracted data and identified the content, context and process factors that enabled or hindered the accountability initiatives in achieving their intended goals. We present and discuss factors that were present in at least two initiatives.

resultsGovernmental initiatives were in most instances established in conjunction with the health reforms that introduced the health insurance programmes they address. Whereas some of these initiatives were effective, many were undermined by poor outreach to citizens, inadequacy of resources, conflicts of interest and power imbalances and lack of fidelity to original design. Non-governmental initiatives often emerged to fill existing gaps in government services and programmes. Many of the non-governmental initiatives had several features which helped them in contributing to citizen empowerment, and these included embeddedness in and being trusted by the local communities, flexibility in operating and reaching out to people and the underlying motivation of people working in them.

conclusionsThe effective implementation of accountability initiatives requires transparency, trust-building measures, active outreach and community engagement and adequate resources. These elements can ensure that initiatives achieve their intended goal of enhancing citizens' access to their health insurance entitlements. Further research is needed to understand how best collaboration between governmental and non-governmental initiatives can be fostered to build synergies between the two toward the achievement of common goals.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesInsurance, HealthSocial ResponsibilityUniversal Health InsuranceHumansHealth insuranceHealth Services AccessibilityHealth systems

Identifiers

PMID40409763
PMCPMC12107628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.