Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40409748›Full record

Observational studyJournal of medical Internet research2025

Leveraging Social Media Data to Understand the Impact of COVID-19 on Residents' Dietary Behaviors: Observational Study.

Chuqin Li, Alexis Jordan, Yaorong Ge, Albert Park

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chuqin LiDepartment of Software and Information Systems, College of Computing and Informatics, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6791-5887
Alexis JordanDepartment of Software and Information Systems, College of Computing and Informatics, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0483-4753
Yaorong GeDepartment of Software and Information Systems, College of Computing and Informatics, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9576-0293
Albert ParkDepartment of Software and Information Systems, College of Computing and Informatics, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2419-0131

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has inflicted global devastation, infecting over 750 million and causing 6 million deaths. In an effort to control the spread of the virus, governments around the world implemented a variety of measures, including stay-at-home orders, school closures, and mask mandates. These measures had a substantial impact on dietary behavior, with individuals discussing more home-cooked meals and snacking on social media.

objectiveThe study explores pandemic-induced dietary behavior changes using Twitter images and text, particularly in relation to obesity, to inform interventions and understand societal influences on eating habits. Additionally, the study investigates the impact of COVID-19 on emotions and eating patterns.

methodsIn this study, we collected approximately 200,000 tweets related to food between May and July in 2019, 2020, and 2021. We used transfer learning and a pretrained ResNet-101 neural network to classify images into 4 health categories: definitely healthy, healthy, unhealthy, and definitely unhealthy. We then used the state obesity rates from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) to assess the correlation between state obesity rates and dietary images on Twitter. The study further investigates the effects of COVID-19 on emotional changes and their relation to eating patterns via sentiment analysis. Furthermore, we illustrated how the popularity of meal terms and health categories changed over time, considering varying time zones by incorporating geolocation data.

resultsA significant correlation was observed between state obesity rates and the percentages of definitely healthy (r=-0.360, P=.01) and definitely unhealthy (r=0.306, P=.03) food images in 2019. However, no trend was observed in 2020 and 2021, despite higher obesity rates. A significant (P<.001) increase in the percentage of healthy food consumption was observed during (39.99% in 2020) and after the shutdown (39.32% in 2021), as compared with the preshutdown period (37.69% in 2019). Sentiment analysis from 2019, 2020, and 2021 revealed a more positive sentiment associated with dietary posts from 2019. This was the case regardless of the healthiness of the food mentioned in the tweet. Last, we found a shift in consumption time and an increase in snack consumption during and after the pandemic. People ate breakfast later (ie, from 7 AM to 8 AM in 2019 to 8 AM to 9 AM in 2020 and 2021) and dinner earlier (ie, from 6 PM to 7 PM in 2019, to 5 PM to 6 PM in 2020). Snacking frequency also increased. Taken together, dietary behavior shifted toward healthier choices at the population level during and after the COVID-19 shutdown, with potential for long-term health consequences.

conclusionsWe were able to observe people's eating habits using social media data to investigate the effects of COVID-19 on dietary behaviors. Deep learning for image classification and text analysis was applied, revealing a decline in users' emotions and a change in dietary patterns and attitudes during and after the lockdown period. The findings of this study suggest the need for further investigations into the factors that influence dietary behaviors and the pandemic's implications of these changes for long-term health outcomes.

Indexed as

COVID-19DietFeeding BehaviorSocial MediaEmotionsHumansObesityPandemicsSARS-CoV-2COVID-19dietary behaviorsdietary patterneating patternsfood consumptionobesityobservational studysocial mediasocial media datatweetsTwitter

Identifiers

PMID40409748
PMCPMC12144483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.