Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40409745›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2025

Treating Lower Phantom Limb Pain in the Postoperative Acute Care Setting Using Virtual Reality: Protocol for a 4-Phase Development and Feasibility Trial.

Renée El-Gabalawy, Megan Crooks, Michael Sean Dyck Smith, Elizabeth Hammond, Patrick Gross, Marinya Roznik, David Perrin, Kristin Reynolds, Gabrielle Logan, Lily Pankratz and 3 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06638918 (Assessing the Feasibility of a Virtual Reality Intervention for Lower Phantom Limb Pain in the Acute Postoperative Period), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06638918 completednot on this map

Assessing the Feasibility of a Virtual Reality Intervention for Lower Phantom Limb Pain in the Acute Postoperative Period

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of ManitobaRan2024 to 2026Enrolled20ConditionsPhantom Limb PainArmsVirtual Reality
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Renée El-GabalawyDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3445-5607
Megan CrooksDepartment of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0009-0000-1813-0338
Michael Sean Dyck SmithNational Research Council, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1952-3616
Elizabeth HammondDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0660-940X
Patrick GrossShared Health Inc, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0009-0002-4620-3877
Marinya RoznikDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0009-0004-4164-9700
David PerrinDepartment of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0534-5302
Kristin ReynoldsDepartment of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5367-7021
Gabrielle LoganDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7007-9373
Lily PankratzDepartment of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8001-7149
Hilary JohnsonDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0009-0004-1813-4485
Linda GirlingDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1430-1376
Daniel WiebeNational Research Council, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.ORCID 0009-0004-9514-1355

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhantom limb pain (PLP) affects most people living with lower limb amputations (LLAs). Nonpharmacological interventions, such as graded motor imagery (GMI), have demonstrated promise as PLP treatments. However, GMI access is limited by low patient buy-in and long public outpatient wait times. Considering PLP has been shown to be more prevalent and severe immediately following LLA, there is an urgent need to bypass barriers to allow for prompt access to PLP interventions. In response to this need, the multidisciplinary research team in this study developed a virtual reality (VR) program that administers GMI treatment. This novel intervention may be completed independently and promptly within the postoperative acute care setting. Before conducting a randomized controlled trial, the VR-GMI program must be developed and refined through a rigorous and multistage feasibility assessment.

objectiveThis protocol aims to outline the development and feasibility of the VR-GMI prototype for treating people with LLAs in the postoperative acute care setting (ie, inpatient and home settings) through an iterative, patient-centered, and descriptive approach.

methodsFour phases of prototype development and assessment were conducted. In phase 1 (completed), the VR-GMI prototype was developed in collaboration with engineers at the National Research Council and in consultation with patient partners. In phase 2 (completed), people with lived experience with amputations were recruited from local physiotherapy and prosthetic clinics to trial the VR-GMI program and provide feedback through semistructured interviews and self-report measures. Phase 3 (completed) consisted of a descriptive case series of individuals who trialed the VR-GMI prototype immediately following their LLAs in the hospital. Results from phase 3 informed the development of a primary quantitative feasibility study. Phase 4 (underway) aims to evaluate the acceptability and pilot outcomes of the VR-GMI program in hospital and home settings as well as improve study procedures for a future randomized controlled trial (phase 4A). Iterative developments were made to the VR-GMI program between each phase to improve prototype fidelity. These iterative developments will also be reviewed in a series of focus groups to finalize the VR-GMI prototype (phase 4B).

resultsRecruitment for phases 1 and 2 was completed in September 2023. Phase 3 was completed in July 2024, and phase 4A is currently underway with 15 participants recruited as of March 2025.

conclusionsThe intervention developed is the first VR PLP treatment implementing GMI and prioritizing an in-depth, patient-centered approach before assessing its efficacy. Doing so will improve the likelihood of successful clinical implementation. Moreover, very few PLP interventions have been assessed in the acute postoperative period when they may prevent PLP before its onset.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06638918; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06638918. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/68008.

Indexed as

Phantom LimbPostoperative CareVirtual RealityAmputation, SurgicalClinical Trials, Phase IV as TopicFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansLower ExtremityMaleObservational Studies as Topicacutefeasibilitygraded motor imagerylower limb amputationpatient-centeredphantom limb painpostoperativepre-emptivepreventivevirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID40409745
PMCPMC12144477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.