ReviewImmunobiology2025
Systemic lupus erythematosus as the paradigm for understanding the complex immune relationships and therapeutic opportunities for targeting complement in autoimmune diseases.
Review in Immunobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring shared biomarkers and their mechanisms in thyroid cancer and systemic lupus erythematosus via bioinformatics analysis.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- The evolving landscape of complement therapeutics in rheumatology.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2026Review
- Autoantibodies in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Diagnostic and Pathogenic Insights.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Complement therapeutics have been increasingly tested and approved for human diseases, often in orphan diseases with strong and apparently causal genetic linkage or mutation-associated features. However, the complement system has been demonstrated to be activated in essentially all human inflammatory, ischemic and autoimmune diseases, suggesting the possibility of even wider therapeutic applications. The goal of this manuscript is to review some of the evidence supporting a wide role for complement in the specific treatment of autoimmune diseases, especially as recent approvals in autoantibody-driven diseases are opening the door to others of these indications. However, in part because of a dearth of complement biomarker data obtained during clinical trials, it is not known what findings would help to predict therapeutic success in other autoimmune diseases. To frame the discussion, it is relevant to point out that the disease systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has been among the most extensively studied autoimmune disease with regards to the varied roles of the complement system, and there are available both human phenotypic studies and murine model data. Because of that history, SLE will be focused upon herein, the many roles of complement in SLE will be reviewed, and informative comparisons to other autoimmune diseases will be made. In aggregate, experimental and phenotypic data suggest that each human autoimmune disease deserves careful attention to the possibility that a specific complement inhibitor targeting the most relevant complement convertase or component will be of benefit, and thus therapeutic approaches should be tested using informative biomarker-driven clinical trial strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.