Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40408767›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

The Effectiveness of Social Media Campaigns in Improving Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Mental Health and Help-Seeking in High-Income Countries: Scoping Review.

Ruth Plackett, Jessica-Mae Steward, Angelos P Kassianos, Marvin Duenger, Patricia Schartau, Jessica Sheringham, Silvie Cooper, Lucy Biddle, Judi Kidger, Kate Walters

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ruth PlackettDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3351-1478
Jessica-Mae StewardDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8503-9730
Angelos P KassianosDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6428-2623
Marvin DuengerUCL Medical School, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5684-2967
Patricia SchartauDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3532-8140
Jessica SheringhamDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3468-129X
Silvie CooperDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0413-8325
Lucy BiddleBristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1090-8771
Judi KidgerBristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1054-6758
Kate WaltersDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2173-2430

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevalence of mental health problems is increasing, particularly among young people, making the prevention of mental health problems and improvements in care a public health priority. Social media, with its wide reach and low-cost information dissemination, has emerged as an important tool for public mental health campaigns in high-income countries. However, there is a limited understanding of the reach of public mental health social media campaigns and their impact on mental health knowledge, attitudes, stigma, and behaviors, such as help-seeking.

objectiveThis review aimed to assess the effectiveness of social media campaigns in high-income countries in improving knowledge and attitudes toward mental health, reducing stigma, promoting help-seeking behavior, and reaching underserved communities.

methodsA scoping review was conducted, involving a comprehensive search of 5 databases (MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and CINAHL) and gray literature from January 2004 to May 2024. We included quantitative evaluations of social media public mental health campaigns from high-income countries with comparable social media use and public health care systems. A narrative synthesis summarized the study characteristics, campaign exposure, reach, and effectiveness by outcomes.

resultsThe review included 26 studies for analysis. Less than half of the studies (11/26, 42%) reported on the reach of mental health campaigns, but for those that did, younger age groups and women were more likely to be aware of campaigns. The most frequently reported outcomes were attitudes about mental health (17/23, 74%) and stigma (17/23, 74%), followed by mental health knowledge (16/23, 70%) and behavior change (15/23, 65%), such as seeking help for a mental health condition. While stigma and attitudes showed the most improvement before and after the campaigns (5/11, 45%), behavior change showed the least positive change over time (1/8, 13%). However, behavior change was the most improved outcome for those who were campaign aware compared to those unaware (12/12, 100%), whereas positive attitudes often did not differ. In fact, some studies showed campaign awareness was associated with negative stereotypes.

conclusionsThe evidence highlights the potential of social media campaigns in improving mental health knowledge, attitudes, stigma, and behavior change. However, due to the methodological limitations of these evaluations, it is challenging to determine if the positive changes in these outcomes are a result of the campaigns or other factors. Campaign awareness seems to be important for initiating behavior change, but these changes are often short-lived. Sustainable impact on mental health requires both individual behavior change and service improvements. Targeting more mental health campaigns at underserved groups could help to reduce stigma and raise awareness in these groups, which could lead to timelier access to services. Consistent measurement of campaign reach and behavior change outcomes could help to understand and maximize campaign impact.

Indexed as

Developed CountriesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PromotionHelp-Seeking BehaviorMental HealthPatient Acceptance of Health CareSocial MediaFemaleHumansMental DisordersSocial Stigmahealth campaignsmental healthPRISMApublic healthreviewsocial marketingsocial media

Identifiers

PMID40408767
PMCPMC12144482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.