ArticlePloS one2025
Re-introduction of India ink testing as a low-cost laboratory diagnostic for cryptococcosis among HIV infected patients in Southern Mozambique: An implementation research protocol.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Phasing out India ink: the case for the CrAg LFA in modern practice.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Laboratory diagnosis for cryptococcal disease among HIV-infected patients remains a challenge in most low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Difficulties with sustained access to cryptococcal rapid tests is cited as a major barrier to the routine screening for cryptococcus in many LMIC. Thus, clinicians in these countries often resort to empirical treatment based solely on clinical suspicion of cryptococcosis. To address this challenge, we aim to evaluate the re-introduction of India ink testing for diagnosis of cryptococcosis among HIV-infected patients in southern Mozambique. India ink testing was historically a common first choice, low-cost, laboratory diagnostic tool for cryptococcal infection. This study uses implementation science methods framed by the Dynamic Adaption Process (DAP) and the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) conceptual frameworks to develop a multi-phase, stepped-wedged trial using mixed-methods approaches. The study will be conducted in six hospitals from southern Mozambique over a period of 15 months and will include the following phases: pre-implementation (baseline assessment), Adaptation-implementation (gradual introduction of the intervention), and post-implementation (post-intervention assessment). This study aims to promote the use of India Ink staining as a cheap and readily available tool for cryptococcosis diagnosis in southern Mozambique. Lessons learned in this study may be important to inform approaches to overcome the existing challenges in diagnosis of cryptococcosis in many LMICs due unavailability of readily diagnostic tools. Trial registration: ISRCTN11882960, Registered 06 August 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.