Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40408620›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Risk formulation mechanism among top global energy companies under large shocks.

Xin Qi, Tianyu Zhao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xin QiInstitute of Chinese Financial Studies, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0009-0008-0199-4859
Tianyu ZhaoSchool of Finance, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7001-1387

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Taking top global energy companies as the epitome, this paper investigates the risk formulation mechanism of the international energy market under the impact of large shocks. We first use the machine learning method in (Liu and Pun, 2022) to calculate the systematic risk level - EMES - for each energy company. Then use network analysis methods to explore the internal risks due to risk comovement among top energy companies. Finally, a dynamic quantile regression model(DNQR) is used to investigate the external risks occasioned by network effects, individual company characteristics, and market environment. Our research finds that the method we use can capture the risk profile of the energy market under different major shocks. Secondly, we find that the risk contagion in the energy market exhibits geographical clustering characteristics, and certain firm-specific factors and market environmental factors of the company have a significant impact on the tail risk of the company. Our research can provide reference and guidance for risk management in the energy market.

Indexed as

CommerceRisk ManagementHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID40408620
PMCPMC12101850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.