Observational studyPloS one2025
Mortality in severe serious adverse events following heterologous and homologous prime-boost vaccination strategies for SARS-CoV-2: A retrospective cohort study.
Observational study in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hybrid immunity strategies: heterologous vaccination combined with natural SARS-CoV-2 infection.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic underscored the urgent need for widespread vaccination to achieve herd immunity and mitigate severe outcomes. To address vaccine supply constraints, heterologous prime-boost strategies were adopted in Korea and other countries. Although studies have explored the effectiveness of heterologous prime-boost SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, comprehensive research on its adverse events (AEs), particularly severe serious AEs (SAEs), remains lacking. As an observational study, this study aims to compare severe SAEs across vaccination strategies and examine factors, including heterologous vaccination, associated with 42-day mortality among patients with severe SAEs, without implying causality. Our retrospective cohort study involved 358 cases of severe SAEs following prime-boost SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in Gyeonggi Province, South Korea, from February 26, 2021, to March 15, 2022. In patients with severe SAEs, the heterologous vaccination was associated with a higher risk of mortality than the homologous viral vector vaccination. Vaccinations performed at vaccination centers were associated with a lower risk of mortality. Furthermore, among patients with severe SAEs, the heterologous group exhibited a higher rate of respiratory diseases and genitourinary diseases compared to the homologous viral vector group. Moreover, the rate of deaths from genitourinary diseases among patients with severe SAEs was significantly higher in the heterologous group compared to the homologous viral vector group. We believe that our study, while limited to associations and not establishing causality, provides critical insights that could inform decision-making in scenarios where heterologous vaccination is necessitated by vaccine shortages or other constraints, particularly in managing severe SAEs and improving patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.