ArticlePloS one2025
Improved generative adversarial networks model for movie dance generation.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To address the challenges of innovation and efficiency in film choreography, this study proposes a dance generation model based on the generative adversarial networks. The model is trained using the AIST++ dance motion dataset, incorporating data from multiple dance styles to ensure that the generated dance sequences accurately mimic various stylistic and technical characteristics. The model integrates a music synchronization mechanism and dance structure constraints. These features ensure that the generated dance aligns seamlessly with the background music in terms of rhythm and emotional expression. Additionally, they help maintain a coherent dance structure. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model achieves a peak signal-to-noise ratio of 28.5 dB in dance video generation, representing an improvement of 4.2 dB over traditional methods. The structural similarity index reaches 0.83, surpassing the 0.79 achieved by conventional approaches. In a blind evaluation, 85% of professional dancers found the generated dance sequences highly consistent with the original dance styles, marking a 13% improvement over traditional methods. These findings indicate that the model effectively captures the details and fluidity of complex dance movements, providing an innovative and efficient solution for film dance generation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.