Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40408537›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Trends in Parkinson's disease medication prescribing patterns in the UK: An interrupted time series analysis (2019-2024).

Khalid Orayj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Khalid OrayjClinical Pharmacy Department, School of Pharmacy, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6651-2306

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to examine prescribing trends for Parkinson's disease (PD) medications in the United Kingdom from 2019 to 2024, focusing on the impact of guidelines from the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) on the use of levodopa and dopamine agonists (DAs). A repeated cross-sectional design was employed, using publicly available data to assess prescribing patterns across the four UK countries. An interrupted time series analysis with linear regression was performed to identify trends, comparing regions with England as the reference point. Levodopa remained the most prescribed PD medication across all UK regions, as revealed by the analysis. In England, levodopa prescriptions increased significantly after the introduction of AAN guidelines, while other regions displayed more stable trends. Northern Ireland exhibited a distinct pattern, with DAs prescribed more frequently than levodopa. The findings also indicated that Scotland and Wales were less responsive to AAN guidance. This study highlights the influence of clinical guidelines on PD prescribing practices in the UK, with regional variations suggesting possible demographic or healthcare system factors. Further research is required to understand these disparities and their implications for PD management.

Indexed as

Antiparkinson AgentsDopamine AgonistsDrug PrescriptionsLevodopaParkinson DiseasePractice Patterns, Physicians'Cross-Sectional StudiesHumansInterrupted Time Series AnalysisPractice Guidelines as TopicUnited KingdomAntiparkinson AgentsDopamine AgonistsLevodopa

Identifiers

PMID40408537
PMCPMC12101742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.