ArticlePloS one2025
Trends in Parkinson's disease medication prescribing patterns in the UK: An interrupted time series analysis (2019-2024).
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Addressing Care Partner Burden from the Underrecognition of Iatrogenic Sexual Behavior Changes in Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026Article
- A modified Delphi consensus study to support and enhance Parkinson's disease management.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2026Article
- Patient-reported outcomes and experiences with COMT inhibitors in the management of motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease: a UK-based nested cross-sectional study.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Early start of opicapone in Parkinson's disease: evidence from a pooled analysis of phase 3 trials for sustained benefit in patients with recent onset of motor fluctuations.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to examine prescribing trends for Parkinson's disease (PD) medications in the United Kingdom from 2019 to 2024, focusing on the impact of guidelines from the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) on the use of levodopa and dopamine agonists (DAs). A repeated cross-sectional design was employed, using publicly available data to assess prescribing patterns across the four UK countries. An interrupted time series analysis with linear regression was performed to identify trends, comparing regions with England as the reference point. Levodopa remained the most prescribed PD medication across all UK regions, as revealed by the analysis. In England, levodopa prescriptions increased significantly after the introduction of AAN guidelines, while other regions displayed more stable trends. Northern Ireland exhibited a distinct pattern, with DAs prescribed more frequently than levodopa. The findings also indicated that Scotland and Wales were less responsive to AAN guidance. This study highlights the influence of clinical guidelines on PD prescribing practices in the UK, with regional variations suggesting possible demographic or healthcare system factors. Further research is required to understand these disparities and their implications for PD management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.