ArticlePloS one2025
Chemical composition and in vitro nutritional assessment of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) plant silage as a forage option for Murciano-Granadina goats.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Inclusion of Novel Olive Pulp: Impacts on Nutrient Digestibility, Rumen Fermentation, and Dairy Goat Performance.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Climate change is exerting significant negative impacts on various sectors, with livestock farming being particularly affected. One of the most pressing challenges in this context is the growing shortage in the availability of conventional fodder. This scarcity has intensified the search for alternative feed sources, with particular interest in underutilized resources often considered waste due to limited knowledge of their nutritional value. This study aimed to assess whether watermelon plant silage (WPS) could be used as a forage source in ruminants. The chemical composition of WPS and alfalfa hay (AH) was analyzed. Results showed similar protein content (21.1 vs. 18.9 g CP/100 g DM, respectively), with WPS exhibiting higher crude fat content (3.16 vs. 1.29 g/100 g DM) but lower hemicellulose (9.95 vs. 14.6 g/100 g DM) and cellulose (20.0 vs. 26.8 g/100 g DM) content compared to AH. In the first in vitro trial, WPS and AH were incubated independently to compare their fermentation behavior. WPS produced a higher concentration of short chain fatty acids (SCFA) (65.9 vs. 61.0 mM; P = 0.304), lower proportions of propionate (P = 0.001), and higher proportions of isobutyrate (P = 0.001). In a second in vitro trial, a formulated goat diet (commercial concentrate and AH in a 1:1 ratio) was used as a control to assess the impact of replacing 25% and 50% of AH with WPS. Trends towards higher value were observed in pH and CH4 concentration as AH was replaced by WPS. The study concluded that WPS could serve as a viable fodder to replace AH in conventional goat diets, simultaneously reducing agricultural waste and serving as a regenerative model for implementing circular economy strategies in affected agronomic sectors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.