ArticlePloS one2025
The US Caselaw as a living system.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents an innovative exploration of the American Caselaw database, encompassing more than five million legal cases spanning three centuries of American history. Using complex network analysis, we reveal the organic nature of the US Caselaw, fundamentally anchored in common law. Through analysis of citation and bibliographic coupling networks, we shed light on the system's internal structure, unveiling communities delineated by regional, federal jurisdiction, and clustering based on similar legal citations. Our research uncovers a remarkable allometric relationship between the activity of judges and the legal case citations, reflecting the analogy between metabolic rate and body mass correlation observed in biological organisms. Furthermore, our results show a consistent self-similar characteristics of the communities and their maximum spanning trees, which also provides relevant insight into the origin of the allometric behavior. This analysis not only reveals the US Caselaw as a "living" entity but also sets a precedent in Caselaw-based judicial system studies, reinforcing the notion of its dynamic, organic functionality in the realm of analyzing complex legal systems.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.