ArticlePloS one2025
Sitting and caregiver speech input in typically developing infants and infants with cerebral palsy.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Body position classification using wearable sensors in infants with cerebral palsy.Infant behavior & development · 2026Article
- Everyday positioning experience in typically developing infants and infants with or at risk for cerebral palsy.Research in developmental disabilities · 2026Article
- Moving, Seeing, Hearing, Smelling and Tasting: How Sensory-Motor Experiences Shape Early Cognitive Development.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development of independent sitting is associated with language development, but the learning experiences underlying this relationship are not well understood. Additionally, it is unknown how these processes play out in infants with motor impairments and delays in sitting development. We examined the real-time associations between sitting and caregiver speech input in 28 5-7-month-old infants with typical development and 22 7-16-month-old infants with cerebral palsy who were at a similar stage of early sitting development. We hypothesized that object labels would be more likely to co-occur with moments of optimal attention to the labeled object while sitting than while in other positions. Infants were video recorded in five minutes of free play with a caregiver. Coders transcribed caregivers' speech, identified instances of object labeling, and coded infants' and caregivers' attentional states during object labeling episodes. We found that caregivers labeled more objects while infants were sitting than while they were in other positions. However, object labels were not more likely to co-occur with infant attention, infant multimodal attention, or coordinated visual attention to the labeled object during sitting. Infants with cerebral palsy were exposed to fewer labels and were less likely to be attending to objects as they were labeled than infants with typical development. Our findings shed light on a possible pathway connecting sitting and language in typical and atypical development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.