ArticleGenome biology and evolution2025
Methylomes Reveal Recent Evolutionary Changes in Populations of Two Plant Species.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nonadditive gene expression and reduced homoeolog expression bias in an intraspecific hexaploid wheat hybrid.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Genomic perspectives on the inference of evolutionary changes in ecological life-history traits.Quantitative plant biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plant DNA methylation changes occur hundreds to thousands of times faster than DNA mutations and can be transmitted transgenerationally, making them useful for studying population-scale patterns in clonal or selfing species. However, a state-of-the-art approach to use them for inferring population genetic processes and demographic histories is lacking. To address this, we compare evolutionary signatures extracted from CG methylomes and genomes in Arabidopsis thaliana and Brachypodium distachyon. While methylation variants (single methylation polymorphisms) are less effective than single nucleotide polymorphisms for identifying population differentiation in A. thaliana, they can classify phenotypically divergent B. distachyon subgroups that are otherwise genetically indistinguishable. The site frequency spectra generated using methylation sites from varied genomic locations and evolutionary conservation exhibit an excess of rare alleles. Nucleotide diversity estimates were three orders of magnitude higher for methylation variants than for single nucleotide polymorphisms in both species, driven by the higher epimutation rate. Correlations between single nucleotide polymorphisms and single methylation polymorphisms in nucleotide diversity and allele frequencies at gene exons are weak or absent in A. thaliana, possibly because the two sources of variation reflect evolutionary forces acting at different timescales. Linkage disequilibrium quickly decays within 100 bp for methylation variants in both plant species. Finally, we have developed a novel deep learning-based approach that infers demographic histories using methylation variation data alone. We identified recent population expansions in A. thaliana and B. distachyon using methylation variants that were not identified when using single nucleotide polymorphisms. Our study demonstrates the unique evolutionary insights methylomes provide that single nucleotide polymorphisms alone cannot reveal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.