Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40408444›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Surgical techniques and outcome assessment of a novel vascularized orthotopic rodent whole eye transplantation model.

Yang Li, Chiaki Komatsu, Lin He, Maxine R Miller, Jila Noori, Yolandi van der Merwe, Leon C Ho, Ian A Rosner, Joshua M Barnett, Kayvon Jabbari and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Emerging Entities in Vascularized Composite Allotransplantation: A New Layer to Ongoing Challenges.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Yang LiDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Chiaki KomatsuDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Lin HeDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Maxine R MillerDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Jila NooriDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Yolandi van der MerweDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye and Ear Institute, Ophthalmology and Visual Science Research Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Leon C HoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye and Ear Institute, Ophthalmology and Visual Science Research Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Ian A RosnerDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Joshua M BarnettDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0006-7227-5574
Kayvon JabbariDepartment of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.
Gadi WollsteinDepartment of Ophthalmology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.
Richard A BilonickDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye and Ear Institute, Ophthalmology and Visual Science Research Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Valeria L N FuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye and Ear Institute, Ophthalmology and Visual Science Research Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Mario G SolariDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
An-Jey A SuDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Kevin C ChanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Eye and Ear Institute, Ophthalmology and Visual Science Research Center, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4012-7084
Joel S SchumanDepartment of Ophthalmology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America.
Kia M WashingtonDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1803-5888

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently there are no surgical solutions to restore vision in the irreversibly blind. Whole eye transplantation (WET), is an appealing surgical approach for restoration, replacement, and reconstruction of nonfunctioning eyes. Development of a reliable animal model to test the integrity and functionality of the transplanted eye is an essential step towards clinical whole eye transplantation. This study presents a feasible vascularized orthotopic eye transplantation preclinical rat model to study the structural and functional outcomes of whole eye transplantation. Syngeneic orthotopic transplants were performed in rats, involving anastomoses between carotid arteries, external jugular veins, and optic nerve coaptations of donors and recipients. The transplanted and recipient native eyes were assessed by ocular exam under anesthesia, optical coherence tomography (OCT), histology, magnetic resonance imaging and electroretinography. A 100% surgical survival rate of recipients with maintained long-term health demonstrated this to be a reliable and reproducible model. Assessment from clinical examination under anesthesia revealed that segments of native eyes appeared normal throughout the duration of the study, but transplanted eyes presented mild chemosis of the eye lids, mild ciliary flush of the conjunctiva, cornea neovascularization, mild engorgement of the vessels in the iris, and mild opacities in the lens in some animals. Most of these findings improved over time after transplantation. Doppler optical coherence tomography corroborated the presence of blood flow in transplanted retinas. There was no significant difference in measured IOP between native and transplanted eyes. Both histology and OCT scans demonstrated increased central corneal thickness and decreased total retinal thickness in transplanted eyes. Transplanted eyes exhibit minimal scotopic and photopic ERG responses. To date, no other vascularized orthotopic rodent WET transplantation models have been described in the literature. As functional visual return remains the ultimate goal, this model provides a foundation for future translational strategies and is ideal for testing immunomodulatory, neuroprotective, and neuroregenerative approaches either individually or in combination, as required for total human eye allotransplantation (THEA) to become a clinical reality.

Indexed as

EyeAnimalsElectroretinographyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleModels, AnimalRatsTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID40408444
PMCPMC12101781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.