SynthesisPloS one2025
The role of novel biomarkers in the early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunomagnetic-MXene Bifunctional Probes for Ultrasensitive and Specific Terahertz Metasensing of Tumor-Derived Exosomes.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Detection of Pancreatic Cancer via Specific Metabolite Markers: A Metabolomics Approach.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Metabolic Syndrome and Pancreatic Cancer: Linking Insulin Resistance, Inflammation, and Carcinogenesis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A bibliometric analysis of research trends and future directions in early detection of pancreatic cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Evidence Mapping of ctDNA Reporting in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: Toward a Shared Quantitative Language for ctDNA.Cancers · 2026Review
- Discovery of a Secretory Granule Lumen-Enriched Serum Protein Signature in Resectable Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- The role of hematological biomarkers as diagnostic tool in pre-cancerous patients.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Circulating tumor DNA-guided early detection and minimal residual disease monitoring in pancreatic and biliary cancers: evidence, barriers, and opportunities.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Review
- Research progress on early diagnostic markers for pancreatic cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Review
- ctDNA in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Critical Appraisal.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly detection of pancreatic cancer is essential for improving survival rates. However, noninvasive diagnostic methods are lacking. Novel biomarkers, detectable through liquid biopsy, such as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), microRNAs (miRNAs), protein markers, and metabolites, hold promise for early diagnosis.
methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was conducted for studies published from January 2014 to May 2024. Studies were included if they evaluated novel biomarkers for early pancreatic cancer detection, reported diagnostic performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity), and had a QUADAS-2 score of ≥3. Data on study characteristics, patient demographics, biomarker types, and diagnostic performance were extracted following PRISMA guidelines. A bivariate random-effects model was used to calculate pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve assessed overall diagnostic accuracy. The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of novel biomarkers in detecting early-stage pancreatic cancer.
resultsA total of 43 studies involving 19,326 participants were included, with 2,749 patients having stage I or II pancreatic cancer. The pooled sensitivities and specificities were as follows:. miRNA Biomarkers: Sensitivity 0.88 (95% CI 0.79-0.93), Specificity 0.91 (95% CI 0.82-0.95), DOR 72.68 (95% CI 26.64-198.24), AUC 0.95. Protein Biomarkers: Sensitivity 0.79 (95% CI 0.70-0.86), Specificity 0.88 (95% CI 0.82-0.93), DOR 27.74 (95% CI 14.32-53.76), AUC 0.90. Metabolite Biomarkers: Sensitivity 0.84 (95% CI 0.73-0.92), Specificity 0.85 (95% CI 0.81-0.88), DOR 31.76 (95% CI 12.38-81.48), AUC 0.90. ctDNA Biomarkers: Sensitivity 0.65 (95% CI 0.48-0.81), Specificity 0.94 (95% CI 0.88-0.97), DOR 27.73 (95% CI 12.91-59.55), AUC 0.92. Subgroup analyses showed combining biomarkers with CA19-9 improved diagnostic accuracy. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the findings.
conclusionsNovel biomarkers, particularly miRNAs and protein markers, demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy for early pancreatic cancer detection and have potential for clinical application in improving early diagnosis and patient outcomes. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, Identifier: PROSPERO (CRD42024553633).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.