Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40408406›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Learning to estimate sample-specific transcriptional networks for 7,000 tumors.

Caleb N Ellington, Benjamin J Lengerich, Thomas B K Watkins, Jiekun Yang, Abhinav K Adduri, Sazan Mahbub, Hanxi Xiao, Manolis Kellis, Eric P Xing

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Caleb N EllingtonComputational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.ORCID 0000-0001-7029-8023
Benjamin J LengerichDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Thomas B K WatkinsCancer Institute, University College London, London WC1E 6DD, United Kingdom.
Jiekun YangDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Abhinav K AdduriComputational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.
Sazan MahbubComputational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.ORCID 0000-0002-8667-3649
Hanxi XiaoDepartment of Computational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260.ORCID 0000-0003-3849-1696
Manolis KellisDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.ORCID 0000-0001-7113-9630
Eric P XingComputational Biology Department, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213.

Funding

Sample-specific Models for Molecular Portraits of Diseases in Precision MedicineR01GM140467 · NIGMS · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI XING, ERIC P · 2020 to 2023
$1.2M
HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01GM140467NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM140467
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancers are shaped by somatic mutations, microenvironment, and patient background, each altering gene expression and regulation in complex ways, resulting in heterogeneous cellular states and dynamics. Inferring gene regulatory networks (GRNs) from expression data can help characterize this regulation-driven heterogeneity, but network inference requires many statistical samples, limiting GRNs to cluster-level analyses that ignore intracluster heterogeneity. We propose to move beyond coarse analyses of predefined subgroups by using contextualized learning, a multitask learning paradigm that uses multiview contexts including phenotypic, molecular, and environmental information to infer personalized models. With sample-specific contexts, contextualization enables sample-specific models and even generalizes at test time to predict network models for entirely unseen contexts. We unify three network model classes (Correlation, Markov, and Neighborhood Selection) and estimate context-specific GRNs for 7,997 tumors across 25 tumor types, using copy number and driver mutation profiles, tumor microenvironment, and patient demographics as model context. Our generative modeling approach allows us to predict GRNs for unseen tumor types based on a pan-cancer model of how somatic mutations affect gene regulation. Finally, contextualized networks enable GRN-based precision oncology by providing a structured view of expression dynamics at sample-specific resolution, explaining known biomarkers in terms of network-mediated effects and leading to subtypings that improve survival prognosis. We provide a SKLearn-style Python package https://contextualized.ml for learning and analyzing contextualized models, as well as interactive plotting tools for pan-cancer data exploration at https://github.com/cnellington/CancerContextualized.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Regulatory NetworksNeoplasmsHumansMachine LearningMutationTumor Microenvironmentcancerheterogeneitymultitask learningnetworkspersonalized models

Identifiers

PMID40408406
PMCPMC12130817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.