ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025
The cortical critical power law balances energy and information in an optimal fashion.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Data-driven ANN-based visual decoding enables unsupervised functional alignment.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Naturalizing perceptual experience: the explanatory power of probabilistic computation and the holographic solution.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
- Heavy-tailed update distributions arise from information-driven self-organization in nonequilibrium learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Revisiting the high-dimensional geometry of population responses in the visual cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- The cortical critical power law balances energy and information in an optimal fashion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Glucose metabolism echoes long-range temporal correlations in the human brain.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A recent study has suggested that the stimulus responses of cortical neural populations follow a critical power law. More precisely, the power spectrum of the covariance matrix of neural responses follows a power law with an exponent indicating that the neural manifold lies on the edge of differentiability. This criticality is hypothesized to balance expressivity and robustness in neural encoding, as population responses on a nondifferential fractal manifold are thought to be overly sensitive to perturbations. However, contrary to this hypothesis, we prove that neural coding is far more robust than previously assumed. We develop a theoretical framework that provides an analytical expression for the Fisher information of population coding under the small noise assumption. Our results reveal that, due to its intrinsic high dimensionality, population coding maintains reliability even on a nondifferentiable fractal manifold, despite its sensitivity to perturbations. Furthermore, the theory reveals that the trade-off between energetic cost and information makes the critical power-law coding the optimal neural encoding of sensory information for a wide range of conditions. In this derivation, we highlight the essential role of a neural correlation, known as differential correlation, in power-law population coding. By uncovering the nontrivial nature of high-dimensional information coding, this work deepens our understanding of criticality and power laws in both biological and artificial neural computation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.