Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40408396›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Characterization of blood microbial population in beef calves with clinical signs of sepsis using 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

Giuliano Borriello, Flaminia Valentini, Sara Ferrini, Giorgia Di Muro, Giulia Cagnotti, Elena Grego, Angela Maria Catania, Maria Cristina Stella, Ugo Ala, Patrizia Nebbia and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Giuliano BorrielloDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4993-0511
Flaminia ValentiniDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Italy.
Sara FerriniDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Italy.
Giorgia Di MuroDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Italy.
Giulia CagnottiDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Italy.
Elena GregoDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Italy.
Angela Maria CataniaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Italy.
Maria Cristina StellaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Italy.
Ugo AlaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Italy.
Patrizia NebbiaDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Italy.
Antonio D'AngeloDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Italy.
Claudio BellinoDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis, a dysregulated host response to infection, severely affects calf health. To date, sepsis diagnosis relies on clinical examination and positive blood culture. Differently, in humans 16S rRNA gene analysis is a valuable adjunct to blood culture as it allows for broader assessment of bacterial DNA in whole blood and its fractions. However, its efficacy in cattle remains unknown. Therefore, this study characterized and compared the bacterial DNA detected in whole blood and its fractions between healthy calves and those showing clinical signs of sepsis. The study sample was 18 Piedmontese calves classified according to their clinical status as suspected septic (S, 8/18) or healthy (H, 10/18). Aseptic blood samples were collected into EDTA tubes for 16S rRNA gene analysis of whole blood (WB), plasma (PL), buffy coat (BC), and red blood cells (RBC). Aseptic samples were additionally taken only from the S calves for blood culture. Clinical and microbiological parameters were compared between the two groups and between the blood fractions within each group. The S calves were diagnosed with pneumonia (3/8, 37.5%), enteritis (3/8, 37.5%), and omphalitis (2/8, 25%). Microbiome analysis revealed significant intra-group differences in α and β diversity indices between PL and the other blood fractions for both groups. Comparison between the S and the H calves showed differences in β diversity indices for PL and WB. DNA of known pathogens (e.g., Escherichia coli) and species not commonly associated with sepsis (e.g., Cutibacterium acnes) were more abundant in the S calves. Moreover, in S calves, 16S rRNA gene sequencing detected E. coli DNA more often (8/8, 100%) than blood culture (2/8, 25%). While the DNA of several bacteria can be detected in calves showing clinical signs of sepsis, further studies are needed to clarify its origin, role, and distribution in blood fractions.

Indexed as

BacteriaCattle DiseasesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSepsisAnimalsCattleDNA, BacterialDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID40408396
PMCPMC12101658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.