ArticlePloS one2025
Characterization of blood microbial population in beef calves with clinical signs of sepsis using 16S rRNA gene sequencing.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis, a dysregulated host response to infection, severely affects calf health. To date, sepsis diagnosis relies on clinical examination and positive blood culture. Differently, in humans 16S rRNA gene analysis is a valuable adjunct to blood culture as it allows for broader assessment of bacterial DNA in whole blood and its fractions. However, its efficacy in cattle remains unknown. Therefore, this study characterized and compared the bacterial DNA detected in whole blood and its fractions between healthy calves and those showing clinical signs of sepsis. The study sample was 18 Piedmontese calves classified according to their clinical status as suspected septic (S, 8/18) or healthy (H, 10/18). Aseptic blood samples were collected into EDTA tubes for 16S rRNA gene analysis of whole blood (WB), plasma (PL), buffy coat (BC), and red blood cells (RBC). Aseptic samples were additionally taken only from the S calves for blood culture. Clinical and microbiological parameters were compared between the two groups and between the blood fractions within each group. The S calves were diagnosed with pneumonia (3/8, 37.5%), enteritis (3/8, 37.5%), and omphalitis (2/8, 25%). Microbiome analysis revealed significant intra-group differences in α and β diversity indices between PL and the other blood fractions for both groups. Comparison between the S and the H calves showed differences in β diversity indices for PL and WB. DNA of known pathogens (e.g., Escherichia coli) and species not commonly associated with sepsis (e.g., Cutibacterium acnes) were more abundant in the S calves. Moreover, in S calves, 16S rRNA gene sequencing detected E. coli DNA more often (8/8, 100%) than blood culture (2/8, 25%). While the DNA of several bacteria can be detected in calves showing clinical signs of sepsis, further studies are needed to clarify its origin, role, and distribution in blood fractions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.