ArticlePloS one2025
Establishment of a neonatal resuscitation registry in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: An open cohort study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Improving neonatal resuscitation practices reduces neonatal mortality. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), granular details about provider actions during resuscitation are largely unknown; therefore, identifying targets for improvement is difficult. The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) recognizes the importance of uniform reporting of clinical neonatal resuscitation studies and published a guideline recommending specific variables to include. We established an open cohort study for newborn resuscitation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) as a platform for developing and evaluating novel strategies to improve newborn resuscitation. We included all in-born neonates at two health facilities in Kinshasa, DRC. We gathered data on all enrollees via delivery registry and medical record abstraction. Using the Liveborn Observation app, we directly observed care at birth for a convenience sample. We collected heart rate data when providers used NeoBeat, a battery-operated heart rate meter. From September 2022 to August 2023, we abstracted delivery registry and medical record data for 6,414 newborns and gathered observational data on the infant's breathing status and provider actions for 3,166 (49%). Our dataset includes 85% of ILCOR's recommended core variables applicable to this setting, and 50% of ILCOR's applicable supplemental variables. Our registry also contains variables beyond those recommended by ILCOR that are contextually important for evaluating resuscitation care in LMICs such as duration of suctioning, pauses in positive pressure ventilation and fresh stillbirth. Our experience establishing a resuscitation registry with novel tools in the DRC serves as a model for resuscitation research in low-resource settings. Our cohort study provides important insight to inform subsequent versions of ILCOR's guideline on uniform reporting of neonatal resuscitations studies globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.