ArticlePloS one2025
Acceptability and feasibility of a mobile electronic medical record system for community-based antiretroviral therapy in Lilongwe, Malawi: A rapid qualitative analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing foundational models in digital health technology adoption: A systematic literature review of multidisciplinary factors.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Scaling-up an mHealth system to deliver financial incentives to improve adherence to antiretroviral therapy in Tanzania.Implementation science communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMobile health (mHealth) is reshaping healthcare delivery, especially in HIV management. The World Health Organization advocates for mHealth to provide healthcare workers (HCWs) with real-time data, enhancing client care. However, in Malawi's Lighthouse Trust antiretroviral therapy (ART) clinic, the nurse-led community-based ART (NCAP) program faces hurdles with data management due to lack of access to electronic medical records systems (EMRS) in the community setting. EMRS are not typically available in differentiated service delivery settings where reliable power and internet are often unavailable. We used human-centered design (HCD) processes to create a mobile EMRS prototype, the Community-based ART Retention and Suppression (CARES) app. CARES aims to simplify workflow for HCWs and improve client care. As part of prototype testing, we explore CARES' feasibility and acceptability from the perspective of NCAP HCWs.
methodsWe conducted in-depth interviews among 15 NCAP HCWs. We used a rapid qualitative analysis approach guided by the Technology Acceptance Models (TAM1 and TAM2). The study complied with the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ).
resultsHCWs demonstrated high perceived usefulness for the CARES app to improve healthcare delivery and data management, both of which could facilitate continued and effective use. However, challenges such as app performance, data integration, and system navigation were significant barriers to ease of use, reducing acceptance and current feasibility of scale-up. Despite challenges, HCWs remained optimistic about CARES' potential to enhance NCAP clinical decision-making and data flow in future, likely reflecting organizational expectations for CARES optimization. Beyond the TAM framework, additional themes of consistent staff engagement and considerations for sustainability were identified as critical factors for long-term success. HCWs emphasized the need for continuous training and stakeholder engagement, improved infrastructure, data security protections, and establishing the CARES app and EMRS integration to facilitate CARES' sustained expansion.
conclusionThe study findings underscore the importance of HCD for mHealth buy-in. As HCWs were invested in CARES success, they remained optimistic that the app could enhance NCAP services if user experience and app performance improved. Incorporation of HCW feedback could help deliver the promise of CARES, current and future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.