ArticlePloS one2025
The mind & muscles: Introducing a validated EEG/EMG protocol for recording cognitive-muscular interactions in experimental archaeology.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite extensive research into the biomechanical and cognitive dimensions of early hominin material culture, no study has explored these aspects together in the context of stone tool production and use. In contrast to fields like rehabilitation and sports science, where electroencephalography (EEG) and surface electromyography (sEMG) are often integrated, experimental archaeology lacks such a combined approach. This paper introduces and validates a new protocol that integrates EEG and sEMG to measure neuromechanical activity during a classic stone tool task: cutting leather with a flake. Our experimental design divides the task into three phases: Hold, Aim, and Execute. Consistent with our expectations, results show that all eight muscles are most active during task execution, with the non-dominant hand playing a key role in stabilization during both the Aim and Execute phases. In the preparatory Aim stage, we observed increased beta power in the left frontal region (linked to planning, problem-solving, and working memory) as well as heightened motor activity associated with using the non-dominant hand, which contributes to the stabilization of the target material during this stage. During the Execute phase, beta power in these cortical areas decreased, with peak muscle activation occurring alongside suspected beta desynchronization in the motor region, reflecting intensified movement activity. Overall, these findings closely align with our expectations, validating our combined EEG-sEMG protocol and highlighting the importance of segmenting tool-using tasks into distinct phases, which allows for the identification of dynamic brain-hand interactions throughout the process. The proposed step-by-step protocol offers a new methodological basis for future research into the complexities of hominin behaviors and tool use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.