ArticlePloS one2025
Mild hyperbaric hyperoxia improves aerobic capacity and suppresses cardiopulmonary stress during the maximal cycle-ergometer test.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Influence of experience on cardiovascular diving reflex in professional divers.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aerobic exercise is more recommended than anaerobic exercise for individuals with cardiopulmonary dysfunction to avoid cardiopulmonary stress. However, their oxygen-carrying capacity is already reduced, making it difficult to exercise enough. Therefore, we aimed to investigate whether mild hyperbaric hyperoxia enhances aerobic capacity and decreases cardiopulmonary stress during exercise with a particular focus on the ventilatory threshold (VT). Nineteen healthy men (age 34.9 ± 10.8 years) performed ramp-loading tests on a cycle-ergometer under the three oxygen conditions: hypobaric hypoxia (HYPO; 0.7 ATA, 14.7% O2), normobaric normoxia (NOR; 1.0 ATA, 21% O2), and mild hyperbaric hyperoxia (HYPER; 1.3 ATA, 35% O2). Cardiopulmonary data were recorded using a gas exchange analyzer. VT was assessed based on minute ventilation (VE) using the V-slope method and the work rate on VT (WVT) was determined. Although the maximal values of VE did not differ among the oxygen conditions, WVT in the HYPER condition was significantly higher compared to others (HYPO; 125 ± 21, NOR; 148 ± 24, HYPER; 168 ± 32 [W], each p < 0.01). Systolic blood pressure and double product on VT in the HYPER condition were significantly reduced compared to others (HYPO; 172 ± 21, 23096 ± 4354, NOR; 173 ± 15, 23377 ± 3109, HYPER; 155 ± 18, 21255 ± 3340 [mmHg, beats·min-1·mmHg], each p < 0.05). Although further clinical research targeting other populations is needed to apply mild hyperbaric hyperoxia in clinical practice, due to its positive effects on WVT and cardiopulmonary stress, the HYPER oxygen condition may potentially be used to enhance aerobic capacity and make individuals with cardiopulmonary dysfunction exercise safely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.