ArticlePloS one2025
A minimally invasive marine mammal sex determination method using epidermal tissue recovered from suction-cup tags.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For many baleen whales, minimal sexual dimorphism means that sex cannot necessarily be reliably determined through observation alone. Suction cup tags deployed for behavioral studies of free-ranging whales sometimes retain exfoliated epidermal tissue from the tagged animal that can potentially be used for molecular genetic sexing. This study provides a protocol to recover and preserve skin from suction cup tags and compares the accuracy of resulting PCR-based sex determinations relative to independent data on individual sex. Skin samples (N = 43) were recovered from tags deployed on North Atlantic humpback and right whales of known sex. Of these, data were obtained from 21 tags deployed on 15 individuals. A PCR-based sex determination yielded correct results for 9 male and 11 female samples. One female was misidentified as male in one of two samples collected from the same tag, suggesting the potential for sexing error based on suction cup tag-derived tissue. The probability of accurate results given current information was estimated using Bayes theorem, with a female result estimated to be 100% reliable, and a male result estimated to be 91% reliable. The minimum DNA yield that resulted in a successful PCR run was 29 ng, however four samples with higher DNA yield did not. With further work, this protocol may increase the reliable data that can be collected as part of suction-cup tagging studies of cetaceans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.