Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40408344›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Factors associated with health decision-making autonomy on own healthcare among Tanzanian women: A 2022-2023 demographic health survey study.

Tausi Seleman Haruna, Henry Ofori Duah, Rebecca Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tausi Seleman HarunaFundamentals of Nursing and Basic Sciences, Hubert Kairuki Memorial University, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.ORCID 0000-0003-4117-3576
Henry Ofori DuahCollege of Nursing, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America.
Rebecca LeeCollege of Nursing, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen's health decision-making autonomy is fundamental for the health and well-being of women and their children. It empowers women to make health decisions and exercise their rights and choices surrounding their health. Like most parts of Africa, women's autonomy in Tanzania remains contentious, with an estimated 19% prevalence of health decision-making autonomy in 2015. Given the impact of women's health decision-making autonomy on women's health outcomes and the fact that women's health decision-making autonomy is an ongoing process affected by advancements in technology, economic growth, and social and cultural shifts, understanding the sociodemographic correlates of women's autonomy is imperative.

objectiveTo examine the factors associated with health decision-making autonomy on their own health among Tanzanian women aged 15-49.

methodsA non-experimental cross-sectional study using secondary data from the current Tanzania Demographic and Health Survey and Malaria Indicator Survey (TDHS-MIS) 2022-2023. The R statistical programming language was used to run the analysis. Chi-square and Ordinal Logistic Regression were fitted to identify the sociodemographic characteristics associated with women's health decision-making autonomy on their own health. The odds ratio with its 95% confidence interval was used to determine the significance level at p-value <0.05. All estimates were adjusted for sample design (sample weight, strata, and sampling units).

resultsA total of 9,249 women were included in the analysis. A large proportion (20%) of women aged 25-29. Only 1,908 (21%) of women had complete autonomy, 4,933 (53%) had joint autonomy, and 2,408 (26%) had no autonomy. Women aged 40-44 years (AOR = 2.15; 95% CI: 1.70, 2.71), a higher education level (AOR = 2.07; 95% CI: 1.39, 3.08), richest household wealth index (AOR = 1.80; 95% CI: 1.39, 2.33), currently working (AOR = 1.61; 95% CI: 1.43, 1.83), and living in the Southwest Highlands zone (AOR = 5.86; 95% CI: 4.47, 7.67) were independently associated with higher odds of complete autonomy in their own healthcare as opposed to no autonomy. Rural residence (AOR = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.46, 0.75) was associated with decreased odds of complete autonomy compared to no autonomy.

conclusionThese results show that health decision-making autonomy among Tanzanian women remains very low. Efforts to empower women through better education and means to improve their economic status are needed to increase complete health decision-making autonomy on their health. RECOMMENDATION: Accelerated and concerted efforts to increase health decision-making autonomy among married women will eventually improve their health and well-being and that of society. FUTURE IMPLICATIONS TO PRACTICE, POLICY, AND RESEARCH: The findings can serve as a basis for exploratory qualitative research to further understand the process of health decision-making autonomy among Tanzanian women. Stakeholders can create focused interventions to improve women's health decision autonomy, emphasizing education and initiatives that generate income, especially in rural regions. Policymakers are encouraged to continue creating policies that promote women's education and economic empowerment, as these factors are linked to increased autonomy in healthcare decisions.

Indexed as

Decision MakingPersonal AutonomyWomen's HealthAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMiddle AgedSocioeconomic FactorsTanzaniaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40408344
PMCPMC12101699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.