Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40408335›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Data-driven prior elicitation for Bayes factors in Cox regression for nine subfields in biomedicine.

Maximilian Linde, Laura Jochim, Jorge N Tendeiro, Don van Ravenzwaaij

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maximilian LindeGESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Cologne, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8421-090X
Laura JochimUtrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jorge N TendeiroGraduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1660-3642
Don van RavenzwaaijDepartment of Psychometrics and Statistics, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5030-4091

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomedical research often utilizes Cox regression for the analysis of time-to-event data. The pervasive use of frequentist inference for these analyses implicates that the evidence for or against the presence (or absence) of an effect cannot be directly compared and that researchers must adhere to a predefined sampling plan. As an alternative, the use of Bayes factors improves upon these limitations, which is especially important for costly and time-consuming biomedical studies. However, Bayes factors involve their own difficulty of specifying priors for the parameters of the statistical model. In this article, we develop data-driven priors centered around zero for Cox regression tailored to nine subfields in biomedicine. To this end, we extracted hazard ratios and associated [Formula: see text] confidence intervals from the abstracts of large corpora of already existing studies within the nine biomedical subfields. We used these extracted data to inform priors for the nine subfields. All of our suggested priors are Normal distributions with means of 0 and standard deviations closely scattered around 1. We propose that researchers use these priors as reasonable starting points for their analyses.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchBayes TheoremHumansProportional Hazards Models

Identifiers

PMID40408335
PMCPMC12101706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.