Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40408325›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

The development and validation of the Social Attributions for Mental Illness (SAMI) scale.

Leigh Huggard, Finiki Nearchou, Cliódhna O'Connor

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leigh HuggardSchool of Psychology, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8346-4182
Finiki NearchouSchool of Psychology, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Cliódhna O'ConnorSchool of Psychology, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8134-075X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Existing measures of lay causal attributions for mental illness do not discriminate between the diverse array of social factors known to influence mental health. Moreover, while ample research has emphasised the negative stigma consequences of biological attributions, limited research investigates how different social attributions might relate to stigma attitudes. The study developed and validated a novel scale to measure lay social attributions for various categories of mental illness. Scale items were generated via data triangulation from an online qualitative survey, a rapid umbrella literature review, and a media analysis. An online survey was disseminated to 500 participants, who rated items' importance in causing four mental illness categories: anorexia nervosa, depression, schizophrenia, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis identified and validated the factor structure of the Social Attributions for Mental Illness scale (SAMI) for each mental illness. Factors identified were life circumstances, violence/abuse, relational challenges, and sociopolitical turmoil. Tests of validity demonstrated good construct validity. This scale enables investigation of how social attributions may differ across populations and mental illness categories, and the consequences of such differences for attitudes and behaviour.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersSocial PerceptionAdolescentAdultFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSocial StigmaSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40408325
PMCPMC12101631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.