Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40408089›Full record

ArticleJAMA health forum2025

Coverage Retention and Plan Switching Following Switches From a Zero- to a Positive-Premium Plan.

Coleman Drake, Dylan Nagy, Sarah Avina, Daniel Ludwinski, David M Anderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA health forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Coleman DrakeDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Dylan NagyDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Sarah AvinaDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Daniel LudwinskiDepartment of Economics, Oxford College of Emory University, Oxford, Georgia.
David M AndersonDepartment of Health Services, Policy and Management, University of South Carolina, Columbia.

Funding

AHRQ HHS R01 HS030083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Millions of lower-income Health Insurance Marketplace enrollees were defaulted from zero-premium to positive-premium health plans in 2022, 2023, and 2024. This turnover in zero-premium plans may cause coverage losses by creating administrative burdens that complicate enrollees' ability to maintain coverage. Objective: To determine how turnover affected Marketplace reenrollment. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used log-linear fixed-effects models including counties in 29 states that used the HealthCare.gov platform from 2022 through 2024. Exposure: HealthCare.gov enrollees living in a county that experienced turnover that year. Main Outcomes and Measures: County-year-level counts of overall reenrollment, automatic and active enrollment, and active reenrollment split by whether enrollees stayed with or switched from their previous plan. We controlled for premium affordability, insurer competition, other county characteristics, and state-by-year policy changes. Results: The sample consisted of 2159 counties representing roughly 10 million HealthCare.gov enrollees annually in 29 states that used the HealthCare.gov platform from 2022 through 2024. The share of enrollees living in counties exposed to turnover increased from 10.3% to 93.9% from 2021 to 2022 as the American Rescue Plan Act subsidies were implemented. These increases have persisted into 2024. Turnover across insurers was associated with a 7.0% (95% CI, -12.7 to -1.3) decrease in automatic reenrollment. Any turnover was not associated with changes in active enrollment, though it was associated with a 13.4% decrease (95% CI, -17.7 to -9.1) in enrollees choosing to stay with their previous, default plan and a roughly equivalent 15.0% increase (95% CI, 11.5-18.5) in enrollees choosing to switch plans. Conclusions: Turnover affects coverage losses by decreasing automatic, passive reenrollment among lower-income enrollees that may not realize they need to start paying premiums to retain coverage that previously did not have a premium. Turnover also nudges returning enrollees to select new plans rather than selecting their previous plans. This likely increases insurer price competition but also may create hassles for enrollees. These findings suggest that coverage losses from turnover in 2026 among lower-income Marketplace enrollees may be particularly large if enhanced subsidies from the Inflation Reduction Act expire.

Indexed as

Health Insurance ExchangesInsurance CoverageInsurance, HealthCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPatient Protection and Affordable Care ActPovertyUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40408089
PMCPMC12102699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.