ArticleUpdates in surgery2025
Acute abdomen during chemotherapy: is surgery worthwhile? Insights from a single-center experience.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chemotherapy (CT) has improved cancer treatment, particularly for locally advanced or metastatic diseases. However, CT systemic effects complicate surgical management, especially in emergency scenarios like acute abdomen. This study evaluates outcomes of emergency abdominal surgery in patients undergoing CT. A retrospective analysis was conducted at the Surgical Department of Cardinal Massaia Hospital, Italy, from January 2019 to June 2024. Patients aged ≥ 18 years undergoing emergency surgery for acute abdomen within 30 days of CT were included. Data on demographics, CT regimens, surgical and postoperative outcomes, and survival were analyzed using statistical software. Ethical approval was obtained. Thirty patients (15 males, 15 females; mean age 64.2 ± 10.3 years) were included. Indications for surgery included intestinal obstruction (80%), gastrointestinal perforation (13.3%), and colovesical fistula (6.7%). Peritoneal carcinomatosis was present in 66.7%, and R0 resection was achieved in only one case. Derivative colostomies were performed in 30% of cases. Postoperative complications occurred in 20%, but no re-operations or ICU admissions were required. The 30-day mortality rate was 6.7%. CT was resumed in 46.7% of patients, with median survival of 249 days for obstruction cases. Emergency surgery during CT is rare but feasible, with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates. Prompt resolution of acute conditions allows for CT resumption, improving overall survival. Multicenter studies are needed to validate these findings and establish standardized protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40408064What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.