Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40408025›Full record

SynthesisMolecular neurobiology2025

Investigating the Role of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps as a Therapeutic Target in Traumatic Brain Injury: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Elliott Slough, Anna Pitt-Francis, Antonio Belli, Zubair Ahmed, Valentina Di Pietro, Andrew R Stevens

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Molecular neurobiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elliott SloughNeuroscience and Ophthalmology, Department of Inflammation and Ageing, School of Infection, Inflammation and Immunology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
Anna Pitt-FrancisNeuroscience and Ophthalmology, Department of Inflammation and Ageing, School of Infection, Inflammation and Immunology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
Antonio BelliNeuroscience and Ophthalmology, Department of Inflammation and Ageing, School of Infection, Inflammation and Immunology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
Zubair AhmedNeuroscience and Ophthalmology, Department of Inflammation and Ageing, School of Infection, Inflammation and Immunology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
Valentina Di PietroNeuroscience and Ophthalmology, Department of Inflammation and Ageing, School of Infection, Inflammation and Immunology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK. v.dipietro@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9430-4723
Andrew R StevensNeuroscience and Ophthalmology, Department of Inflammation and Ageing, School of Infection, Inflammation and Immunology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK. a.stevens@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3222-133X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with few treatment options to mitigate secondary injury. Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) may present a potential target for therapy. The systematic review objectives were to characterise NET formation as a feature following TBI; assess the effect of NET modulatory strategies on outcomes; and investigate the relative efficacy of NET modulatory methods. A systematic review was performed, with inclusion criteria of pre-clinical or clinical studies using any model or severity of TBI, and any investigation of the pathophysiological role of NETs and/or modulation of NETs for therapeutic benefit. Following search completion, 849 records were identified with 13 studies eligible for inclusion. All 13 studies characterised NET formation in blood and brain tissue from pre-clinical TBI models, whilst four studies also demonstrated NET formation in serum and brain tissue of TBI patients. Meta-analysis (where ≥ 3 studies reported outcomes) identified that NET modulation was associated with significant improvement of outcomes in preclinical studies, in both modified neurological severity score and latency to falls. No difference in efficacy was identified between NET modulatory methods after sub-group analysis. In addition, the overall risk of bias was judged as high in the included studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that NETs present a promising TBI therapeutic target for future clinical validation. However, the high bias limits this systematic review, and further high-quality studies are required to make definitive conclusions about NET utility as a viable therapeutic strategy in TBI.

Indexed as

Brain Injuries, TraumaticExtracellular TrapsNeutrophilsAnimalsHumansAnimal modelsNET modulationNeuroinflammationNeutrophil extracellular traps (NETs)NeutrophilsTraumatic brain injury (TBI)

Identifiers

PMID40408025
PMCPMC12511129

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.