ArticleMaxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery2025
A novel 3D-printed simulator for hands-on training in orthognathic surgery.
Article in Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- 3D-Printed Models in Oral Surgery Simulation Training: A Scoping Review.Journal of dental education · 2026Article
- Evaluation of structured training in osteotomy and splitting for BSSO using a 3D-printed mandibular model.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOrthognathic surgery addresses skeletal dysgnathias, enhancing both function and aesthetics. Despite its benefits, potential complications underscore the need for well-trained surgeons. 3D-printed anatomical models, a product of additive manufacturing, aid surgical education, especially for young surgeons lacking on-the-job training. This study focuses on an economically designed 3D-printed simulator for orthognathic surgery training.
resultsEvaluation from 31 participants of two orthognatic surgery workshops using the 3D-printed simulator highlighted positive assessments for realism (7.16 ± 2.03/10) and usefulness in training for specific procedures. While commended for simulating limited oral cavity movements and providing a realistic general simulation, soft tissue realism (4.51 ± 2.66/10) suggested room for improvement. Notably, the simulator demonstrated outstanding cost-efficiency (€ 181.55), with reusable components.
conclusionsThe 3D-printed simulator offers a realistic, cost-effective tool for orthognathic surgery training, despite soft tissue realism limitations. The study anticipates further enhancements in 3D-printing technology to address these aspects and advance future iterations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.