Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40407946›Full record

SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2025

Simultaneous robotic-assisted prostatectomy and rectal resection: a systematic review.

Harry Collin, Benjamin Huang, Amila Siriwardana, Craig Harris, Andrew Stevenson, Anojan Navaratnam, Rachel Esler, Matthew J Roberts

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Harry CollinFaculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. hjacollin@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5630-6047
Benjamin HuangDepartment of Urology, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8484-5160
Amila SiriwardanaDepartment of Urology, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6094-1246
Craig HarrisDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9581-9750
Andrew StevensonFaculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5639-3526
Anojan NavaratnamDepartment of Urology, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4684-0235
Rachel EslerDepartment of Urology, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7743-4841
Matthew J RobertsDepartment of Urology, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0552-7402

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PC) and rectal cancer (RC) are common and can require complex management, especially when presenting synchronously or with invasive characteristics. Robotic surgery has emerged as a viable option for managing these challenging cases; however, the outcomes are yet to be summarised or compared to traditional approaches. This systematic review aims to evaluate the feasibility, oncological outcomes, and functional results of simultaneous robotic-assisted resections of the prostate and rectum. Following prior protocol registration (PROSPERO: CRD42023449872) and according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, we conducted a systematic search across multiple databases, selecting studies that involved simultaneous bladder-sparing robotic-assisted prostatectomy and rectal resection. The Joanna Briggs Institute tool was used for risk of bias assessment. Data on patient demographics, treatment details, post-operative course, and functional and oncological outcomes were extracted and analysed. From 1357 identified records, 25 studies met our inclusion criteria resulting in 45 cases/patients. The median patient age was 62 years. Diverse treatment backgrounds and outcome definitions were recorded. Median operative time was 548 min and median estimated blood loss was 450 mL. The overall complication rate was 44.4%, with major complications (Clavien-Dindo III) occurring in 17.8% of cases. Surgical margins were negative in 92.6% of cases. Continence recovery occurred for most (78.6%) of the cases reporting on urinary function. Simultaneous robotic-assisted prostatectomy and rectal resection appears to be a feasible, safe and oncologically effective approach with satisfactory oncological and functional outcomes for managing patients with synchronous or invasive PC and RC.

Indexed as

ProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsRectal NeoplasmsRectumRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsTreatment OutcomeAbdominoperineal resection (APR)Anterior resection (AR)Prostate cancerProstatectomyRectal cancerRobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID40407946
PMCPMC12102092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.