ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2025
Is previous radical prostatectomy an adversity for laparoscopic total extraperitoneal approach for inguinal hernia repair? A propensity score case matched study.
Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAlthough laparoscopic total extraperitoneal (TEP) procedure has gained wide acceptance for inguinal hernia repair, there is still debate on the optimal technique in patients with a history of previous radical prostatectomy (RP). We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic TEP in patients with a previous history of RP using a propensity score case-match analysis.
methodsThis study included male patients undergoing laparoscopic TEP repair between 2013 and 2024. According to the RP status, patients were case-matched based on age, BMI, ASA score, site of hernia and the year of surgery. A total of 162 patients were matched in a 1:5 ratio. The RP and non-RP groups were compared with respect to perioperative outcomes.
resultsThe RP and non-RP group included 27 and 135 patients, respectively. The rate ofconversion to transabdominal preperitoneal repair (11.1%) or open surgery (14.8%) was significantly higher in the RP group (p<0.001). The RP group had longer operative times (160±57 vs. 94±38, p<0.001). The postoperative complication rates (7.4% vs. 6%), postoperative pain scores, length of stay (1.6±0.9 vs 1.2±0.9 days), time to return to daily life (2.9±1.8 vs 2.6±3.0 days), readmission (3.7% vs 0.7%), long-lasting pain (14.8% vs. 11.8%) and recurrence (0% vs 3.2%) were similar in both groups (p>0.05).
conclusionLaparoscopic TEP inguinal hernia repair in patients with a history of RP is feasible and safe with a similar morbidity profile but an increased conversion rate and operative time compared to those with no history of RP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.