Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40407931›Full record

SynthesisHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2025

Management and outcomes profiles of parastomal hernia after radical cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion: a systematic review.

Rui Cao, Xiangyu Shao, Junsheng Li

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rui CaoDepartment of General Surgery, Affiliated Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, P.R. China.
Xiangyu ShaoDepartment of General Surgery, Affiliated Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, P.R. China.
Junsheng LiDepartment of General Surgery, Affiliated Zhongda Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing, P.R. China. Lijunshenghd@126.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4422-9654

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionParastomal hernia following radical cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion (ICPH) is a prevalent postoperative complication which needed a unified scheme for proper management. This review provided a comprehensive summary of the data regarding the occurrence, risk factors, surgical approaches, mesh placement, postoperative complications, and recurrence rates of ICPH, with the aim of offering valuable insights for the standardized management of ICPH.

methodsSystematic literature search was conducted up to November 2024 using databases including MEDLINE and Elsevier, supplemented by manual screening of relevant journals and reference lists. Data extraction focused on incidence, risk factors, surgical approaches, and postoperative outcomes.

resultsA total of 30 studies were included, including 18 retrospective studies and 12 cases. And 3 additional systematic reviews were integrated to extract data concerning the incidence and risk factors of ICPH. The pooled ICPH incidence of 4 studies was 14.36%. Main risk factors included fascial defects ≥ 24 mm, obesity, and female sex. In the choice of surgical approach, minimally invasive techniques dominated (169/367,52%). The most frequently reported methods were the Keyhole (149/328, 45%) and Sugarbaker (113/328, 35%) techniques. In terms of mesh placement, the choice of most cases intraperitoneal placement. The most prevalent postoperative complication was urinary system complications (n = 14). Most of the complications were Clavien-Dindo grade 2 (40/68,59%). Recurrence rates varied widely (0-47%), with Keyhole-associated recurrence up to 52% versus 12.5% for Sugarbaker.

conclusionICPH is a clinical complication that deserves the attention of surgeons. Mesh repair is the current mainstream method. Although there are various surgical methods for mesh repair, each has its own advantages and disadvantages, and a large number of clinical studies are still needed to provide the optimal solution. In addition, the effectiveness of prophylactic mesh placement remains controversial.

Indexed as

CystectomyHernia, VentralHerniorrhaphyIncisional HerniaPostoperative ComplicationsUrinary DiversionHumansIncidenceRecurrenceRisk FactorsSurgical MeshIleal conduitKeyholeMesh repairParastomal herniaRadical cystectomySugarbaker

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.