ReviewHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2025
Management of giant inguinal hernia; report of four cases and review of literature.
Review in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Management of an Amyand's hernia complicated by necrotizing soft tissue infection: a case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
- Giant inguinoscrotal hernia with loss of domain complicated by scrotal abscess requiring bowel resection, orchiectomy, and component separation.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
- Preoperative Botulinum Toxin Type A Use in Giant Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Scoping Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGiant inguinal hernias are rare and their management is associated with peculiar challenges. Most publications are case reports and case series with few patients. This study aims to describe our experience in the management of four giant inguinal hernias and to review the literature with emphasis on the global distribution, presentation and approach to management. Researches on rare presentations are commonly challenging because of paucity of data. CASE PRESENTATION: We present four (4) cases of Giant inguinal hernia with ages between 39 years and 62 years with duration of groin swelling between 3 years and 32 years. Two had Type 1 Giant hernia while the others had Types 2 and 3. One was diabetic and hypertensive and another hypertensive. They both required multi-disciplinary management. All 3years and 32 yewere operated with oblique groin incisions. Polypropylene MESH was applied after simple closure of resultant wide defects in the posterior wall of the inguinal canal. Epidural anesthesia was used for three patients. The patient with Type 3 Giant hernia was done with General anesthesia. He required a debulking omentectomy and also needed respiratory support post-operatively. A literature review of patients in 10 years period with emphasis on the global distribution of publications, the presentation and the different approaches to management of patients was done.
conclusionGiant inguinal hernias though rare are encountered in all continents. Most are due to neglect and can be managed with a modified groin approach and Liechtenstein MESH hernioplasty. Multi-disciplinary approach to management with attention to possible complications due to size of the sac and co-morbidities are important. Studies are needed to guide and streamline management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40407921What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.