ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2025
Umbilical hernia repair by the eTEP, a reproducible and valuable technique.
Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term outcomes of robotic intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM) versus robotic enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) ventral hernia repair: a propensity-matched analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Single-incision laparoscopic preperitoneal repair: novel approach to umbilical hernia surgery (with video).Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Article
- The short-term clinical outcomes and technical experience with the enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal approach for ventral and incisional hernia repair.Surgery today · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUmbilical hernia is a common surgical condition, and mesh repair is generally recommended to reduce recurrence rates. Various techniques have been employed, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. The enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) approach offers the benefit of placing the mesh outside the abdominal cavity while maintaining a minimally invasive approach. However, it is associated with longer operative times and requires a higher level of surgical expertise. In this study, we present our method of eTEP for umbilical hernia repair, which has proven to be safe, effective, and highly reproducible.
methodsPatients with umbilical hernias and defect sizes larger than 1 cm were prospectively enrolled. All patients underwent repair using the eTEP technique, which featured an inferior port position and a caudal-to-cranial dissection approach. Detailed procedural techniques and surgical skills are described, and perioperative outcomes were recorded.
resultsA total of 26 umbilical hernias were repaired using the eTEP technique, with no conversions to an open approach. The mean operative time was 101.8 ± 31 min (range: 47 to 185 min), and the average postoperative hospital stay was 1.8 ± 0.8 days (range: 1 to 5 days). There were no cases of surgical site infection, skin necrosis, wound dehiscence, bowel obstruction, urinary complications, or recurrence.
conclusionThe eTEP approach for umbilical hernia repair is a safe, efficient, and reproducible alternative to traditional methods. Its unique port positioning, tailored dissection, and optional mesh fixation contribute to reduced complications and improved patient outcomes. Future studies should focus on long-term follow-up to validate the durability and effectiveness of this technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40407918What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.