Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40407902›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2025

Genome-wide association analyses for revealing QTN, QTN-by-environment and QTN-by-QTN interactions in soybean phenology.

Wenliang Yan, Xitong Liang, Yang Li, Xingtian Jiang, Bing Liu, Leilei Liu, Jianying Feng, Benjamin Karikari, Tuanjie Zhao, Haiyan Jiang and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Wenliang YanSanya Institute of Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing Agricultural University, Sanya, 572025, People's Republic of China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7543-6376
Xitong LiangNational Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Engineering Research Center of Smart Agriculture, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory for Crop System Analysis and Decision Making, Ministry of Agriculture, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Information Agriculture, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Yang LiNational Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Engineering Research Center of Smart Agriculture, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory for Crop System Analysis and Decision Making, Ministry of Agriculture, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Information Agriculture, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Xingtian JiangNational Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Engineering Research Center of Smart Agriculture, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory for Crop System Analysis and Decision Making, Ministry of Agriculture, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Information Agriculture, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Bing LiuSanya Institute of Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing Agricultural University, Sanya, 572025, People's Republic of China. bingliu@njau.edu.cn.
Leilei LiuNational Engineering and Technology Center for Information Agriculture, Engineering Research Center of Smart Agriculture, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory for Crop System Analysis and Decision Making, Ministry of Agriculture, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Information Agriculture, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Jianying FengKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetics Improvement of Soybean, Ministry of Agriculture/Zhongshan Biological Breeding Laboratory (ZSBBL)/National Innovation Platform for Soybean Breeding and Industry-Education Integration/State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization/College of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, People's Republic of China.
Benjamin KarikariDépartement de Phytologie, Université Laval, Québec, QC, G1 V 0 A6, Canada.
Tuanjie ZhaoKey Laboratory of Biology and Genetics Improvement of Soybean, Ministry of Agriculture/Zhongshan Biological Breeding Laboratory (ZSBBL)/National Innovation Platform for Soybean Breeding and Industry-Education Integration/State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics & Germplasm Enhancement and Utilization/College of Agriculture, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, People's Republic of China. tjzhao@njau.edu.cn.
Haiyan JiangCollege of Artificial Intelligence, Nanjing Agricultural University Nanjing, Nanjing, 210095, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China. jianghy@njau.edu.cn.
Yan ZhuSanya Institute of Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing Agricultural University, Sanya, 572025, People's Republic of China. yanzhu@njau.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextPhenology plays an important role in determining the yield and environmental adaptation of soybean, but easily affected by quantitative trait nucleotides (QTN)-by-environment interactions (QEI) and QTN-by-QTN interactions (QQIs). Detailed understanding of the genetic basis and the interactions between genome and environments is critical for the development of cultivars with geographical-appropriate phenology.

methodsA compressed variance component mixed model (3VmrMLM) was used to detect QTNs, QEIs and QQIs for four key phenological traits of 345 soybean accessions. These traits include days from emergence to first flower (R1), pod beginning (R3), seed formation (R5) and maturity initiation (R7). Meanwhile, QTNs, QEIs and QQIs were identified in at least ten environments and Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (BLUP) value.

results(i) A total of 110-193 QTNs, 10-31 QEIs and 4-8 QQIs were identified for each trait. (ii) Sixty-six genes involved in regulation of flower to maturity were identified by functional annotations of GO. (iii) Further haplotype analysis assigned soybean phenology-associated genes into 34 haplotype blocks with 136 haplotypes. (iv) Fifty-nine genes contained within 31 haplotype blocks can be considered as candidate genes for regulating soybean phenology, because changes in these haplotypes led to significant variations in the corresponding phenological traits.

conclusionsExtensive genetic analysis of the QEIs and QQIs was conducted on key phenological stages in soybean. The candidate genes predicted provide valuable information for functional validation to elucidate the molecular mechanism underlying the soybean phenology.

Indexed as

Gene-Environment InteractionGenome-Wide Association StudyGlycine maxQuantitative Trait LociChromosome MappingFlowersGenome, PlantGenotypePhenotypePolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.