Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40407893›Full record

GuidelineHNO2025

[Recommendations for selection of target parameters and process recommendations for audiological and technical functional testing of cochlear implant : Prepared by the ERA consortium (AG-ERA) of ADANO in cooperation with the Implantable Hearing Systems expert committee of the DGA. Confirmed by the board of ADANO on 31.01.2025. German version].

Alexander Müller, M Blümer, O C Dziemba, A Elsholz, L Fröhlich, U Hoppe, D Polterauer, T Rahne, T Steffens, M Walger and 4 more

Abstract readEnglish AbstractPractice Guideline
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in HNO, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Alexander MüllerHörzentrum Berlin, Klinik für Hals‑, Nasen-, und Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Plastische Operationen, Zentrum für Hörimplantate, Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Landsberger Allee 49, 10249, Berlin, Deutschland. alexander.mueller@vivantes.de.
M BlümerKlinik- und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland.
O C DziembaKlinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen‑, Ohrenkrankheiten, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Deutschland.
A ElsholzKlinik- und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Deutschland.
L FröhlichKlinik und Poliklinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland.
U HoppeHals‑, Nasen‑, OhrenKlinik, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland.
D PolterauerKlinik und Poliklinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland.
T RahneHallesches Hör- und ImplantCentrum, Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Hals- Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale), Deutschland.
T SteffensKlinik und Poliklinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, Deutschland.
M WalgerKlinik und Poliklinik für Hals‑, Nasen‑, Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie, Audiologisches Zentrum, Universitätsklinikum, Köln, Deutschland.
T WeißgerberKlinik für Hals‑, Nasen‑, Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsmedizin, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland.
T WesargUniversitätsklinikum Freiburg, Medizinische Fakultät, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland.
S ZirnPeter-Osypka-Institut für Medizintechnik, Hochschule für Technik, Wirtschaft und Medien, Offenburg, Deutschland.
T RaderKlinik und Poliklinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Continuous monitoring of the technical and physiological function of cochlear implants (CI) is a central part of the care process. Despite worldwide efforts to standardise procedures, there is still considerable variation between CI centres, particularly in terms of the methods used, their practical implementation and the definition of meaningful target parameters. A standardised structured test procedure is needed for reliable quality assurance and better comparability. Against this background, the ADANO Working Group for Evoked Response Audiometry (AG-ERA), in close cooperation with the Cochlear Implants and Implantable Hearing Systems Committee of the German Society of Audiology (DGA), developed a minimum standard for audiological and technical functional testing of CIs in an open consensus process. This standard defines basic requirements for performance and documentation and serves as a practical recommendation for CI centres. It is intended to improve interdisciplinary cooperation, increase the quality of care and enable structured long-term optimised care for CI patients.

Indexed as

AudiologyAudiometry, Evoked ResponseCochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsGermanyHumansEvoked potentialsImpedancesMeasurement methodsMinimum standardQuality assurance

Identifiers

PMID40407893
PMCPMC12289825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.