Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40407846›Full record

ReviewDermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2025

[New therapeutic approaches in the neoadjuvant/adjuvant treatment of melanoma].

Veronika Zenderowski, Laura Schreieder, Konstantin Drexler, Sebastian Haferkamp

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Veronika ZenderowskiKlinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie und Venerologie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Deutschland. veronika.zenderowski@ukr.de.
Laura SchreiederKlinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie und Venerologie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Deutschland.
Konstantin DrexlerKlinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie und Venerologie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Deutschland.
Sebastian HaferkampKlinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie und Venerologie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauß-Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough effective treatment options for malignant melanoma already exist, currently available adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies are not always sufficient to prevent relapse or ensure a long-term treatment response. Many patients develop resistance or show inadequate responses to existing therapies. Therefore, there is an urgent need for new and more effective therapeutic approaches in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings to sustainably improve patient prognosis.

objectiveThis study provides an overview of current developments in melanoma treatment, with a particular focus on the adjuvant and neoadjuvant application of novel immunotherapies. MATERIAL AND

methodsA literature search and discussion of relevant recent studies was carried out.

resultsAdjuvant mRNA-based adjuvant treatment combined with pembrolizumab demonstrated a significantly improved relapse-free survival compared to pembrolizumab monotherapy (79% vs. 62%). The value of adjuvant LAG‑3 antibodies in combination with PD‑1 blockers remains inconclusive. A neoadjuvant intralesional treatment with daromun after complete removal of tumor tissue reduced the risk of recurrence by 41% and led to a significant extension in relapse-free survival (16.7 months vs. 6.8 months). Tebentafusp improved overall survival in metastatic uveal melanoma and is currently being investigated in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting. DISCUSSION: The mRNA-based treatment combined with checkpoint inhibitors have the potential to induce long-term immune responses. The efficacy of LAG-3 inhibitors in the adjuvant setting is currently under evaluation in clinical studies. The immunocytokine treatment with daromun shows promising results in the neoadjuvant setting by stimulating both local and systemic immune responses. Future studies should focus on identifying optimal combinations of treatment to improve the long-term prognosis of patients.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyMelanomaNeoadjuvant TherapySkin NeoplasmsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalChemotherapy, AdjuvantHumansRNA, MessengerAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalpembrolizumabRNA, MessengerImmunocytokinesLAG‑3 antibodiesmRNA-based cancer therapyOncolytic virusesRelapses

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.