Observational studyeLife2025
Molecular feature-based classification of retroperitoneal liposarcoma: a prospective cohort study.
Observational study in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03838718 (REtroperitoneal SArcoma Registry), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
REtroperitoneal SArcoma Registry (RESAR): Prospective Collection of Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Patient's Data, Radiological and Pathological Material for the TransAtlantic Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prognosis-oriented molecular subtypes of retroperitoneal liposarcoma.Clinical and translational medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RPLS) is a critical malignant disease with various clinical outcomes. However, the molecular heterogeneity of RPLS was poorly elucidated, and few biomarkers were proposed to monitor its progression. Methods: RNA sequencing was performed on a training cohort of 88 RPLS patients to identify dysregulated genes and pathways using clusterProfiler. The GSVA algorithm was utilized to assess signaling pathway levels in each sample, and unsupervised clustering was employed to distinguish RPLS subtypes. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between RPLS subtypes were identified to construct a simplified dichotomous clustering via nonnegative matrix factorization. The feasibility of this classification was validated in a separate validation cohort (n=241) using immunohistochemistry (IHC) from the REtroperitoneal SArcoma Registry (RESAR). The study is registered with https://clinicaltrials.gov/ under number NCT03838718. Results: Cell cycle, DNA damage and repair, and metabolism were identified as the most aberrant biological processes in RPLS, enabling the division of RPLS patients into two distinct subtypes with unique molecular signatures, tumor microenvironment, clinical features, and outcomes (overall survival [OS] and disease-free survival [DFS]). A simplified RPLS classification based on representative biomarkers (LEP and PTTG1) demonstrated high accuracy (area under the curve [AUC]>0.99), with patients classified as LEP+ and PTTG1-, showing lower aggressive pathological composition ratio and fewer surgery times, along with better OS (HR = 0.41, p<0.001) and DFS (HR = 0.60, p=0.005). Conclusions: Our study provided an ever-largest gene expression landscape of RPLS and established an IHC-based molecular classification that was clinically relevant and cost-effective for guiding treatment decisions. Funding: This work was supported by grants from the Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Project (Z191100006619081), National Natural Science Foundation of China (82073390), and Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program (2023QNRC001). The study sponsors had no role in the design and preparation of this manuscript. Clinical trial number: NCT03838718.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.