Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40407691›Full record

ArticleAntibodies (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Validation and Optimization of PURE Ribosome Display for Screening Synthetic Nanobody Libraries.

Bingying Liu, Daiwen Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bingying LiuDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543, Singapore.ORCID 0009-0003-3971-5206
Daiwen YangDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore 117543, Singapore.

Funding

Singapore Food Agency SFS-RND-SUFP_001_07
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesPURE (Protein synthesis Using Recombinant Elements), an ideal system for ribosome display, has been successfully used for nanobody selection. However, its limitations in nanobody selection, especially for synthetic nanobody libraries, have not been clearly elucidated, thereby restricting its utilization.

methodsThe PURE ribosome display selection process was closely monitored using RNA agarose gel electrophoresis to assess the presence of mRNA molecules in each fraction, including the flow-through, washing, and elution fractions. Additionally, a real-time validation method for monitoring each biopanning round was implemented, ensuring the successful enrichment of target protein-specific binders. The selection process was further optimized by introducing a target protein elution step prior to the EDTA-mediated disassembly, as well as by altering the immobilization surfaces. Finally, the efficiency of PURE ribosome display was enhanced by replacing the spacer gene.

resultsThe efficiency of PURE ribosome display was merely 4% with an unfavourable spacer gene. Using this spacer gene, EGFP- and human fatty acid-binding protein 4-specific nanobodies from a synthetic nanobody library were we successfully identified through optimizing the selection process. Choosing a spacer gene less prone to secondary structure formation increased significantly its efficiency in displaying synthetic nanobody libraries.

conclusionsImplementing a target protein elution step prior to EDTA-mediated disassembly and modifying the immobilization surfaces effectively increase selection efficiency. For PURE ribosome display, efficiency was further improved using a suitable spacer gene, enabling the display of large libraries.

Indexed as

binder selectionPURE ribosome displaysynthetic nanobody library

Identifiers

PMID40407691
PMCPMC12101283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.